• Wed, May 15 - 10:25 am ET

Angelina Jolie’s Mastectomy: Her Body. Her Choice. Period.

angelina jolie mastectomy irresponsible

In addition to the (admittedly small, yet still entirely worth mentioning) segment of people who reacted to Angelina Jolie‘s mastectomy with sexist comments, there’s another faction: People who are decrying her decision to remove her breasts because they feel it’s medically irresponsible.

Quite a few people who commented on our Facebook page, as well as commenters on my post from yesterday and many other people on Twitter, voiced concerns that Angelina’s mastectomy was “unnecessary” and that her actions could influence other women to do the same thing. Some doctors also feel that Angelina’s public decision will encourage women to have unnecessary surgery, even if they aren’t BRCA1 gene carriers.

There’s more than a few things to consider here: Angelina’s own personal history, her role as a public figure, and, of course, the way breast cancer is currently treated and portrayed in our culture. Let’s not forget that Angelina’s own mother died of cancer as a result of being a carrier of the BRCA1 gene. Her identity, her own likely very fraught emotional history as a daughter of a mother with cancer, in conjunction with her own identity as a mother, was a big influencer in her decision, as she herself said. I certainly don’t presume to judge anyone, not even a celebrity, on the mental and emotional factors that go into decision-making about their own health. She is, after all, a person, not just a famous person. I wonder if people would be so quick to criticize a neighbor who watched her mother die and then chose a mastectomy?

But of course, Angelina Jolie is not our neighbor. Angelina Jolie is Angelina Jolie, one of the most famous and beautiful women in the world. Lauren Brown at Quartz says breast cancer awareness is at an all-time high; Will Jolie’s decision be too far-reaching, will it create a hysteria that’s even larger than the pinkwashing we’ve been experiencing since the Susan G. Komen Foundation got its start?

While I understand the concerns about the impact of a public figure making a radical decision (And don’t get me wrong, I often have a healthy distrust of the medical establishment, and I’m sympathetic to alternative treatments for anything, including cancer), I’m also a forever advocate of women making their own educated decisions about their own bodies and their own health care. That’s exactly what Angelina Jolie did. She made the best decision for herself and her life: not your life, not my life, and not anyone else’s. Hers.

Does it matter that her decision will likely influence other women? Of course it does. That’s why she made her mastectomy public! She was hoping that, by speaking out about this, she could raise awareness about preventative mastectomy. And boy has she, right?

But that doesn’t mean you or I or anyone else has to do what she did. My hope is that her decision will encourage women to become active participants in their own healthcare and make their own decisions about their own bodies, whether that be what kind of birth control to use, what doctor to go to, or yes, what kind of breast cancer prevention or treatment to consider.

It really doesn’t matter what you or I think of her decision, whether you or I would get a preventative double mastectomy or have our ovaries removed. It doesn’t matter whether other women who carry the BRCA1 gene have had success with detoxing, with a vegan diet, with vitamins, or with waiting until a diagnosis. Neither you nor I nor anyone else (not even Brad Pitt), has a say regarding Angelina’s health or body.

Angelina’s body, Angelina’s choice. Period.

Photo: Nikki Nelson/WENN.com

What We're Reading:
Share This Post:
  • Mitch

    My cousin thinks Angelina did this in the name of vanity while I completely disagree and pretty much echo the sentiments in this article !

  • Christine

    I applaud her decision, because from all that I have read it was informed and medically responsible. I also think her measured and articulate oped piece explains not only her decision but advocates for BRCA1 testing and accessibility. I have a good friend who is now dying from her 3rd occurance of ovarian cancer, which followed breast cancer. She of course carries the BRCA1 gene, and only wishes she had known and had the choice to undergo mastectomies 15 years ago.

  • JennyWren

    I think the people declaring this procedure “unnecessary” are just demonstrating once again how little we as a society appear to trust grown-ass women with their own health choices.This is Angelina Jolie; she probably had access to some of the best medics in the world and certainly as a carrier of a faulty BRCA1 gene the medical consensus is with her in agreeing that this is an effective long-term treatment for her particular condition. I’m more inclined to believe in that consensus than the needless input of an anonymous internet commentor.
    Startling as it may seem, women do not needlessly lop off their breasts at the drop of a hat or simply because a celebrity is doing it; equally shockingly, a mastectomy is not the same as a boob job. No-one puts themselves through surgery this radical and life-changing without thinking long and hard about it and without the consent of a medical practitioner. If Jolie’s article encourages some women (who can afford it) to get tested, that is actually a good thing, and it’s up to them and their doctors to decide what to do with the results.

  • everythingofcooking

    she’s brave! I admire and wish her health!
    everythingofcooking.com