Miracle Baby Thankfully Survives, But Doesn’t Prove Any Moral Point

premature baby

I’m genuinely glad to hear that 13 weeks premature baby, Kenda Mohamed, has beaten the odds and survived the worst of her medical problems. She was born in October 2012 weighing just 1.4lbs and suffered from numerous “conditions and infections” associated with her extreme prematurity. The doctors allegedly suggested 7 times that her life supporting care be discontinued, allowing Kenda to die, but her parents refused.

First, I’d like to point out that it’s unclear that Kenda will ever live a normal life. Her father states: “We don’t know if she will ever be able to walk or talk, it’s just too early, but we’re still keeping our hope that she will be able to lead an independent life.” This is pretty important to the thrust of the story, although it is mentioned in the original link as a kind of an afterthought, following several pictures of Kenda looking like the totally healthy and lucky baby that she may not really be.

Moreover, even if Kenda does turn out to lead a happy life with reasonably good health, the article announcing this miracle kind of misses the larger picture. It’s not that anyone wishes for sick babies to die. But the kind of intensive care that a less than 2lb baby requires in order to have even a minimal shot at life is immensely expensive.

As far as I can tell, most Scottish people use the publicly-funded National Health Services. This means that they are at the mercy of what services are approved for them and which are not. In such a medical care system, it is absolutely critical that the NHS remain financially solvent, because people have planned their lives and careers around it. As health care becomes more technologically advanced, some things get cheaper (e.g., generic drugs) but other things become much more expensive (e.g., neonatal units that would have previously had no choice but to allow some preemies to die).

Again, I’m not saying that dead babies are right or good. But the money has to come from somewhere. If the NHS isn’t careful, it could easily run into financial problems, the result of which would be having to deny life-saving treatments to babies with a great shot at surviving, or cancer patients with good odds for survival and families of their own. 

The reason that Kenda is being billed as a kind of miracle baby is exactly because it was not reasonable to expect her to survive, or to survive in good health. The doctors were reasonable to suggest that she be removed from life support, and the state would have been justified in discontinuing funding for her care. It is more fair for the National Health Services to make rationing policies upfront than to spend wantonly on patients (like “miracle babies”) now, at the expense of arguably more compelling patients later.

People will point to this story, and miracle baby stories like it, as evidence that life support should never be removed from struggling patients. But the situation is just more complicated than that.

Image: Shutterstock

Share This Post:
    • AStewart

      Quick, move to Britain and join the Conservatives so you can help them to continue tearing apart our beloved NHS.
      Everyone knows the NHS needs to evolve (for babies, see James Dyson and the SCBU/NICU at Bath Hospital), but one of its fundamental values is that aid is provided based on clinical need, not whether anyone else deserves it more than you. If a baby is born needing intensive care then they will be given it. If that child goes on to develop disabilities or long term illnesses, the NHS will continue to provide treatment. Aside from decisions made on which drugs/treatments that the NHS can offer, money shouldn’t and for the most part doesn’t come into the healthcare equation in the UK.

      The NHS will look after you from cradle to grave, and every stage in between. Most of us “pay” through National Insurance contributions (which also cover welfare benefits – I pay around £75 a month) and in return never have to worry that we won’t be able to afford care when the time comes. It is just what civilised nations do. I am happy that my contributions may have helped pay for this, as I would want the same for my own child in the same situation.

    • Van

      I am really not understanding the point of the letter written. Everybody deserves a right to life and I commend the doctors and the parents for not giving up on this little person. What right does the author have to decide who deserves treatment and who doesn’t. If it is your loved one on that bed, I would hope you would do everything in your power to fight for him or her.