<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cancer Drug Gleevec® Decreases Recurrence in Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cancer-drug-gleevec%c2%ae-decreases-recurrence-in-primary-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumor-gist-patients-57/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cancer-drug-gleevec%c2%ae-decreases-recurrence-in-primary-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumor-gist-patients-57/</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:34:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregory D. Pawelski</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cancer-drug-gleevec%c2%ae-decreases-recurrence-in-primary-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumor-gist-patients-57/comment-page-1/#comment-44482</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory D. Pawelski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancercommentary.com/2007/04/18/cancer-drug-gleevec%c2%ae-decreases-recurrence-in-primary-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumor-gist-patients/#comment-44482</guid>
		<description>Will Gleevec always work?

Cell culture assay results of fresh tumor specimens with Sutent (a new multi-targeted kinase inhibitor approved for use as a second-line drug for tumors that are non-responsive to Gleevec) have shown tumor cell clusters treated with this drug sometimes take up copious amounts and sometimes have taken up little or none. This drug inhibits several proteins involved in triggering replication in cancer cells. With the new EGFRx Assay, it is possible to see which cells have taken it up and which haven&#039;t.

Drug resistance/drug response is multifactorial. It matters not that a particular intracellular molecular target is present, if the drug can&#039;t even get into the cell to interact with that target or if it gets in but is metabolized or actively extruded out of the cell (a common mechanism of drug resistance). What is measured with the EGFRx Assay is the net result of everything.

The proto-oncogene KIT, a tyrosine kinase that is inhibited by Gleevec, is overexpressed in a majority of GISTs. Some patients have suffered relapses due to acquired point mutations in KIT, which prevents Gleevec from binding to the protein. Similar mutations have been characterized in EGFR from Iressa-resistant lung cancer patient.

It is not known why Gleevec (and most other drugs) either works or doesn&#039;t work. The advantage of the EGFRx Assay is that there is a good idea of what will happen. The disadvantage is that it is not known why the drug worked or why it didn&#039;t work, only that it worked. The EGFRx Assay uses a combination of the morphologic endpoint (DISC) and one or more of the metabolic endpoints (MTT, ATP, resazurin) to test the targeted molecular drugs.

The kinases act on and modify the activity of specific proteins. So people will try and get some sort of gene-based test to measure the expression-mutation of these kniases. But something more elemental is going on. Does the drug even enter the cell? Once entered, does it immediately get metabolized or pumped out, or does it accumulate?

Some clones of tumor cells don&#039;t accumulate these drugs. These cells won&#039;t get killed by it. But you wouldn&#039;t pick this up with an assay which only measured the kinases themselves. The new EGFRx Assay measures the net effect of everything which goes on (Whole Cell Profiling). Are the cells ultimately killed, or aren&#039;t they?

Source: Cell Function Analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Gleevec always work?</p>
<p>Cell culture assay results of fresh tumor specimens with Sutent (a new multi-targeted kinase inhibitor approved for use as a second-line drug for tumors that are non-responsive to Gleevec) have shown tumor cell clusters treated with this drug sometimes take up copious amounts and sometimes have taken up little or none. This drug inhibits several proteins involved in triggering replication in cancer cells. With the new EGFRx Assay, it is possible to see which cells have taken it up and which haven&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Drug resistance/drug response is multifactorial. It matters not that a particular intracellular molecular target is present, if the drug can&#8217;t even get into the cell to interact with that target or if it gets in but is metabolized or actively extruded out of the cell (a common mechanism of drug resistance). What is measured with the EGFRx Assay is the net result of everything.</p>
<p>The proto-oncogene KIT, a tyrosine kinase that is inhibited by Gleevec, is overexpressed in a majority of GISTs. Some patients have suffered relapses due to acquired point mutations in KIT, which prevents Gleevec from binding to the protein. Similar mutations have been characterized in EGFR from Iressa-resistant lung cancer patient.</p>
<p>It is not known why Gleevec (and most other drugs) either works or doesn&#8217;t work. The advantage of the EGFRx Assay is that there is a good idea of what will happen. The disadvantage is that it is not known why the drug worked or why it didn&#8217;t work, only that it worked. The EGFRx Assay uses a combination of the morphologic endpoint (DISC) and one or more of the metabolic endpoints (MTT, ATP, resazurin) to test the targeted molecular drugs.</p>
<p>The kinases act on and modify the activity of specific proteins. So people will try and get some sort of gene-based test to measure the expression-mutation of these kniases. But something more elemental is going on. Does the drug even enter the cell? Once entered, does it immediately get metabolized or pumped out, or does it accumulate?</p>
<p>Some clones of tumor cells don&#8217;t accumulate these drugs. These cells won&#8217;t get killed by it. But you wouldn&#8217;t pick this up with an assay which only measured the kinases themselves. The new EGFRx Assay measures the net effect of everything which goes on (Whole Cell Profiling). Are the cells ultimately killed, or aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Source: Cell Function Analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>