<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China refutes PNAS report of new H5N1 strain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain-24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain-24/</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:47:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flu Patrol &#187; International agencies work to resolve H5N1 names</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain-24/comment-page-1/#comment-218939</link>
		<dc:creator>Flu Patrol &#187; International agencies work to resolve H5N1 names</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flupatrol.com/2006/11/16/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain/#comment-218939</guid>
		<description>[...] Born out of the recent conflict caused by published reports of Fujian-like H5N1 strain and China&#8217;s denial of its existence, international agencies met last week to iron out the nomenclatures of H5N1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Born out of the recent conflict caused by published reports of Fujian-like H5N1 strain and China&#8217;s denial of its existence, international agencies met last week to iron out the nomenclatures of H5N1. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain-24/comment-page-1/#comment-218919</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flupatrol.com/2006/11/16/china-refutes-pnas-report-of-new-h5n1-strain/#comment-218919</guid>
		<description>I guess &quot;more than 99 per cent similar to the H5N1 subtype virus&quot; for sure makes it a different strain, huh?   Oh wait, we share 99% of our genetic makeup with the housefly, and more than 99.9% of it with the chimp.  I think I&#039;ll go eat a banana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess &#8220;more than 99 per cent similar to the H5N1 subtype virus&#8221; for sure makes it a different strain, huh?   Oh wait, we share 99% of our genetic makeup with the housefly, and more than 99.9% of it with the chimp.  I think I&#8217;ll go eat a banana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>