Skip to content

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Eye Contact May Be Overrated

September 11, 2007 by Kristina Chew, PhD  
Filed under Health

‘What is potentially most interesting about our work is that it shows what people with autism can do given the right circumstances, rather than what they cannot do.’

So says Dr Courtenay Norbury, from Royal Holloway, University of London and the University of Oxford, about research suggesting that autistic persons “take note of social cues such as eye contact more closely than previously thought, regardless of whether or not they have an additional language impairment,” as noted in the September 10th Science Daily. Norbury and a team of researchers used eye-tracking devices to record the eye motions of a group of autistic teenage boys, half of whom did not have “language difficulties” and half of whom had “additional language impairments.”

A previous study about social cues and autism had used the same eye-tracking devices and found that “autistic people spent more time fixating on the mouths of people in the scene while non-autistic peers spent more time looking at their eyes.” The “scene” that was shown was a clip from the 1966 black-and-white film, Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf, with Elizabeth Taylor: I have always wondered why researchers chose this film. Any scene from it would not be too easy for Charlie to follow. The lack of color would make it much more difficult for him to process and sort out what he was seeing; the dialogue among two women and two men would be equally hard for him to follow, and I rather suspect he would simply ignore the scene. Norbury’s team, on the other hand, showed the autistic teenagers “video-clips of young people interacting in familiar situations.” The researchers made sure that the scenes shown were about things that the participants would watch, rather than about what the researchers had determined would be best from their perspective.

To the surprise of the team, they found no significant increase in the time autistic individuals with language difficulties spent looking at the mouth region compared to those without this additional language problem. In addition, the amount of time both groups with autism spent looking at eyes did not differ from their non-autistic peers.

‘Our work suggests that individuals with autism, like their typically developing peers, can and do attend to important social cues such as the eyes when viewing familiar social scenes. The individuals with autism who had additional language impairments tended to spend less time looking at faces generally, but when they did look at the face, they spent significantly more time looking at eyes than mouths.’

My son Charlie has always had trouble focusing on stationary objects and tracking moving ones; he has been helped a bit in this thanks to prism lenses (which he only now wears while bike-riding). When I have taken Charlie to a movie about things that he is actually familiar with and that he can track (Charlotte’s Web last winter), he definitely watches and is interested and attends (and Charlie saw that movie three times). He was able to identify each animal and the settings (a barn, a home, a school, a carnival). Charlie has not been much of a fan of cartoons because he seems to struggle to track the moving drawings: He has not been interested in any of the Shrek movies (which are, for Charlie, excessively “talky”). But he did sit rapt for most of Over the Hedge which, though computer animated, contained familiar scenes of backyards and the rooms of a house. (I’ll never forgotten him laughing and rocking and jumping in his seat when the animals open the refrigerator and stand in awe of the food all lit up within.) (I meant to take my surfer boy to Surf’s Up this past summer but by the time we got around to it, it was gone from the theaters: We await the DVD.)

Further, the study suggests that eye contact as a marker of social ability may be overrated:

The study also highlighted the variation in the length of time people, both autistic and non-autistic, spend looking at other people’s eyes, suggesting that eye contact is only one of many factors affecting social success.

Given the right circumstances, with appropriate demands and requests, perhaps we can really see what it is kids like Charlie are seeing, and can learn to reorient our own perspective.

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

11 Responses to “Eye Contact May Be Overrated”
  1. gettingthere says:

    Hear! Hear! My son would look at and focus on anything that interests him. He doesn’t like prolonged eye contact, though. He claims that seeing his reflection in someone else’s eyes scares and distracts him. However, you’d better look at him and focus on his face when you’re addressing him because he complains you’re not listening otherwise!

    I also grew up in a multicultural society where it wasn’t cool to look your elders squarely in the eye as this could be interpreted as being rude and disrespectful. I have a wide range of perfectly NT friends from a variety of cultures who don’t make prolonged eye contact for the very same reason. Unfortunately, some come across as “shifty” to Western eyes.

  2. Leanne says:

    Patrick has what I call “face contact” when he’s communicating with you. I believe eye contact is overrated.

  3. Samantha, I hadn’t seen your post, thanks for the link—maybe it’s the start of a change in thinking about the “importance” of eye contact.

  4. Lolasmom says:

    Lola has never had any problem looking me in the eye – she’ll even grab me by the chin to force ME to look at HER when I’m distracted or doing something else (no, as far as I know no one has ever done this to her!). Same goes for other members of her close inner circle. Now, with strangers its another story – brief glances is all she’ll muster at first until she feels comfortable and/or decides she likes them. (Her father’s side of the family is a shy, quiet lot. I don’t think Lola’s great-uncle has ever looked me in the eye for more than a few seconds!)

    Why eye contact has been held up as the holy grail of autism symptoms still confuses me… I really have never seen what the big deal is. It’s a total pet peeve of mine that, as soon as laypeople find out Lola has autism, all they do is try to get her to look at them. Geez! I know she feels pressured (and pestered) by it, and it makes her avoid their gaze all the more.

  5. mcewen says:

    We fell for that one hook line and sinker a few years ago. We could have spent our time [and theirs] much more productively. So much for hindsight!
    Cheers

  6. Samantha says:

    Kristina, the idea had been floating around in my head for most of the summer. I can’t remember now what prompted me to actually write it down though.

    I too grew up in a culture where it was not kosher for the young ‘uns to look the grown folk full in the face. We managed alright.

  7. Daisy says:

    Amigo (Asperger’s Sundrome) is also congenitally blind. He is still learning “face contact” because it is socially important.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] know now, that it was probably one of my more futile campaigns, but hindsight is so often 20/20 as “Kristina Chew” points out in her recent [...]

  2. Quirky, NOS says:

    [...] bursts of “PoPo [Cantonese for “maternal grandmother], school doctor,” looking in other directions for long periods when spoken too: These may well be something more than quirks, and they signal [...]

  3. [...] Eye Contact May Be OverratedWhy, or why not, or why maybe, autistic kids need to be taught to “look at me.” [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.