Skip to content

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

“He” is NOT a man, but “he” is pregnant again.

November 13, 2008 by Marijke Durning, RN  
Filed under Women's Health

I wrote about this in July when Thomas Beatie gave birth to a child ("Pregnant man" gives birth). I said it then and I’ll say it again, Thomas is NOT a man. She was born a female and still has her womb and ovaries. Taking male hormones, growing facial hair and building up muscles doesn’t make you a man. Thomas is still capable of getting pregnant and that makes her a woman still. So the stories of a "man getting pregnant" are false, sensationalistic, and misleading. And I’m afraid that Thomas is the one to blame for a lot of it.

Thomas is pregnant again and I’m assuming we’ll have another media circus. I have no issues with how people live their lives, as long as they’re not harming anyone – but I do believe that Thomas’s need for publicity over this can and will likely be harmful to the children later. We aren’t talking about a gay or lesbian couple that has decided to have a family – we’re talking about a woman who looks male, but still has not given up her female sex organs. Either have a sex-change operation or don’t – but don’t boast about being a male who is pregnant.

~~~~

Tags: , , , , ,

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

One Response to ““He” is NOT a man, but “he” is pregnant again.”
  1. Eliza says:

    oh I agree and after reading the interview I must say for someone that wants privacy this isn’t the way to do it. He states it isn’t about the money, it might not be but it sure is about being known.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.