<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Healthcare Solves 3 GOP Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:17:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-13950</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-13950</guid>
		<description>&quot;Joel Hunter is a conservative, Republican megachurch pastor in Central Florida. He&#039;s giving the Democrats some free advice, if they care to hear it: Even if you stick with Roe V. Wade, you can show evangelicals that you are the pro-life party by showing us how you will actually reduce abortions---and how you will support &quot;life&quot; in other areas besides abortion.&quot;

The low-down is this: The GOP sucks at preventing abortion because they are using it as a distraction tactic - distracting Pro-Lifers by using their emotionally overwhelming love for the babies. 

Healthcare REALLY prevents abortion. It encourages women to keep from getting pregnant and it encourages women to carry the baby to term for adoption. So far it&#039;s prevented 9 million abortions. Think about it. 

Here&#039;s more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zack-exley/will-the-real-pro-life-pa_b_119146.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Joel Hunter is a conservative, Republican megachurch pastor in Central Florida. He&#8217;s giving the Democrats some free advice, if they care to hear it: Even if you stick with Roe V. Wade, you can show evangelicals that you are the pro-life party by showing us how you will actually reduce abortions&#8212;and how you will support &#8220;life&#8221; in other areas besides abortion.&#8221;</p>
<p>The low-down is this: The GOP sucks at preventing abortion because they are using it as a distraction tactic &#8211; distracting Pro-Lifers by using their emotionally overwhelming love for the babies. </p>
<p>Healthcare REALLY prevents abortion. It encourages women to keep from getting pregnant and it encourages women to carry the baby to term for adoption. So far it&#8217;s prevented 9 million abortions. Think about it. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zack-exley/will-the-real-pro-life-pa_b_119146.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zack-exley/will-the-real-pro-life-pa_b_119146.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10192</guid>
		<description>Karen I believe it is true now because we&#039;re doing the conservative abstinence only plan. 1994 was 1994. Whatever they were doing then was a failure. What we&#039;re doing now, the conservative abstinence only plan - is a failure. 

Perhaps if we gave up the &quot;extremes&quot; and met in the middle we might find some success. 

How bout telling kids the truth? Giving information rather than withholding it is the most effective way to go. 

Waking up to the world our teenagers actually live in instead of wishing for the one we wish they had would be a better way to go. 

The current curriculum that&#039;s being taught here is a joke. It&#039;s not only negative about condom use, it is dangerously naive. These kids are talking about sex in a way we never imagined and the curriculum isn&#039;t addressing any of their very sophisticated issues - anal sex, what to do if someone tapes you having sex with his buddy and posts it on the Internet, what&#039;s the difference between coercion and respect.

We need to let go of our shoulds and accept responsibility for the effect. 

Abstinence only is a good intention. Good intentions pave the way to Hell. 

We need to combine that good intention with more effective methodology and the bold abrasive truth to really reduce teen sex, STDs, teen pregnancy, abortion, teen domestic violence, and date rape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen I believe it is true now because we&#8217;re doing the conservative abstinence only plan. 1994 was 1994. Whatever they were doing then was a failure. What we&#8217;re doing now, the conservative abstinence only plan &#8211; is a failure. </p>
<p>Perhaps if we gave up the &#8220;extremes&#8221; and met in the middle we might find some success. </p>
<p>How bout telling kids the truth? Giving information rather than withholding it is the most effective way to go. </p>
<p>Waking up to the world our teenagers actually live in instead of wishing for the one we wish they had would be a better way to go. </p>
<p>The current curriculum that&#8217;s being taught here is a joke. It&#8217;s not only negative about condom use, it is dangerously naive. These kids are talking about sex in a way we never imagined and the curriculum isn&#8217;t addressing any of their very sophisticated issues &#8211; anal sex, what to do if someone tapes you having sex with his buddy and posts it on the Internet, what&#8217;s the difference between coercion and respect.</p>
<p>We need to let go of our shoulds and accept responsibility for the effect. </p>
<p>Abstinence only is a good intention. Good intentions pave the way to Hell. </p>
<p>We need to combine that good intention with more effective methodology and the bold abrasive truth to really reduce teen sex, STDs, teen pregnancy, abortion, teen domestic violence, and date rape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10202</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10202</guid>
		<description>Revka, one last point to answer two of your questions. 

There is one plan before congress right now where it is still paid for by the employee and employer (but not tied together in a small pool) as well as the current taxes we already pay for SCHIPS, Medicaire, Medicaid, Social Security. 

The difference is that it forces insurance companies to give everyone an affordable price without allowing them to choose not to insure or cover someone who is sick or has a pre-existing condition.

The government acts only as an administrator, but utilizes private insurance companies and private hospitals. A fully Capitalist system with less fraud.

The plan SAVES the taxpayer over $1 TRILLION dollars rather than costing more as you assume.

More details here: http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthy-americans-act/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revka, one last point to answer two of your questions. </p>
<p>There is one plan before congress right now where it is still paid for by the employee and employer (but not tied together in a small pool) as well as the current taxes we already pay for SCHIPS, Medicaire, Medicaid, Social Security. </p>
<p>The difference is that it forces insurance companies to give everyone an affordable price without allowing them to choose not to insure or cover someone who is sick or has a pre-existing condition.</p>
<p>The government acts only as an administrator, but utilizes private insurance companies and private hospitals. A fully Capitalist system with less fraud.</p>
<p>The plan SAVES the taxpayer over $1 TRILLION dollars rather than costing more as you assume.</p>
<p>More details here: <a href="http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthy-americans-act/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthy-americans-act/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10207</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s completely unrealistic to expect adults to stop having sex.

People aren&#039;t getting married until their late 20s and into their late 30s - are you really expecting all of them to abstain? That&#039;s so never going to happen.

Bunches of people are divorced and have already lost their &quot;virginity&quot; but don&#039;t want to get married again. They aren&#039;t about to adopt abstinence as a lifestyle either. 

Not saying you aren&#039;t right about it being 100% effective - just saying it&#039;s not a realistic solution as much as a moral judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s completely unrealistic to expect adults to stop having sex.</p>
<p>People aren&#8217;t getting married until their late 20s and into their late 30s &#8211; are you really expecting all of them to abstain? That&#8217;s so never going to happen.</p>
<p>Bunches of people are divorced and have already lost their &#8220;virginity&#8221; but don&#8217;t want to get married again. They aren&#8217;t about to adopt abstinence as a lifestyle either. </p>
<p>Not saying you aren&#8217;t right about it being 100% effective &#8211; just saying it&#8217;s not a realistic solution as much as a moral judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10213</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10213</guid>
		<description>I KNOW!  It is completely unrealistic that ANYTHING is going to stop (at the very least, a portion of) teenagers from having pre-marital sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I KNOW!  It is completely unrealistic that ANYTHING is going to stop (at the very least, a portion of) teenagers from having pre-marital sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10211</guid>
		<description>Expecting the whole world to hop on board with abstinence isn&#039;t a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expecting the whole world to hop on board with abstinence isn&#8217;t a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10209</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10209</guid>
		<description>Revka - I am suggesting that many women do cut their hours to below 40 to spend more time with their children - which leaves them without insurance. 

I&#039;m also suggesting that many women 
Do work fulltime because of the insurance benefits and studies show they would seek fewer hours to spend more time with their children. 

I am also suggesting that if women are getting their insurance via a husband&#039;s job then they, and their children are more likely to qualify for welfare programs if they divorce (odds are one in two) or become widowed. 

If we give women access to insurance - without being tied to their husbands - we do reduce the number of people relying on public assistance for their healthcare.

Lots of women/mothers would be able to just buy it with their 20-30 hour work week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revka &#8211; I am suggesting that many women do cut their hours to below 40 to spend more time with their children &#8211; which leaves them without insurance. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also suggesting that many women<br />
Do work fulltime because of the insurance benefits and studies show they would seek fewer hours to spend more time with their children. </p>
<p>I am also suggesting that if women are getting their insurance via a husband&#8217;s job then they, and their children are more likely to qualify for welfare programs if they divorce (odds are one in two) or become widowed. </p>
<p>If we give women access to insurance &#8211; without being tied to their husbands &#8211; we do reduce the number of people relying on public assistance for their healthcare.</p>
<p>Lots of women/mothers would be able to just buy it with their 20-30 hour work week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10218</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry Myron have we met?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry Myron have we met?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracee Sioux</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracee Sioux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10217</guid>
		<description>&quot;socialism&quot; give me a break. The sky is falling, the sky is falling! 

No one is a socialist. We&#039;re just tired of getting screwed by the insurance companies.

Universal health care is a private system with private insurance Companies. Which is completely capitalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;socialism&#8221; give me a break. The sky is falling, the sky is falling! </p>
<p>No one is a socialist. We&#8217;re just tired of getting screwed by the insurance companies.</p>
<p>Universal health care is a private system with private insurance Companies. Which is completely capitalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myron WW Buckhalter</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns-28/comment-page-1/#comment-10303</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron WW Buckhalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogfabulous.com/healthcare-solves-3-gop-concerns/#comment-10303</guid>
		<description>How do you argue and debate issues with an elephant on your head?  You&#039;re not worth the trouble to debate or respond back to any degree of concern.  Goodbye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you argue and debate issues with an elephant on your head?  You&#8217;re not worth the trouble to debate or respond back to any degree of concern.  Goodbye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>