Skip to content

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Male Circumcision Doesn’t Cut Your HIV Risk

July 19, 2009 by Peggy Rowland  
Filed under Women's Health

A recent trial to see if circumcision helped protect both men and women from HIV was halted after researchers learned the benefit is one-sided.

The study, published in Lancet medical journal, shows that while circumcision could help protect men from HIV, it doesn’t help women. However, researchers note that women may also benefit indirectly via reduced rates of HIV among men.

condom-hiv-reduce

Researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and their colleagues in Uganda studied 922 uncircumcised, HIV-infected men and 163 wives or female sex partners of the men. Some of the men studied were immediately circumcised, while others waited for two years.

The study found that circumcision didn’t reduce HIV transmission to females over a period of 24 months. Researchers believe that condom use remains essential for reducing the spread of AIDS. Read more about this study at msnbc.

(Image via stock.xchng)

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

4 Responses to “Male Circumcision Doesn’t Cut Your HIV Risk”
  1. Hugh7 (subscribed) says:

    The men were all already HIV+ so this trial told us nothing about the risk to them. 18% of the partners of the circumcised men got infected, compared to 12% of the partners of non-circumcised, but they cut the trial short before it reached statistical significance. (They cut short the trials that claimed to show circumcision protects men, too.) So for all we know circumcision INcreases the risk to women, and it’s doubtful whether it protects men.

  2. Hugh, the researchers believe that circumcision helps protect men, though maybe this study didn’t prove it. Here’s a quote from the CBS article I linked to:

    “The foreskin of the penis, which is removed during circumcision, is rich in cells that are particularly easy for the virus to infect. The theory is that removing this source of vulnerable cells makes infection more difficult.”

  3. Hugh7 (subscribed) says:

    The fact is that those cells are everywhere: “Langerhans cells, along with other classes of dendritic cells, are universally found in all skin. There is minimal variation between parts of the body in their content of Langerhans cells. They are found in all genital tissue including the glans, foreskin, shaft, scrotum, clitoris, clitoral hood, labia, and vagina.”

    But before anyone tries to explain why circumcision protects, they need to establish that it does. In the randomised controlled trials on which this claim is based, several times as many circumcised men dropped out, their HIV status unknown, as non-circumcised men were infected. So it’s quite possible that circumcision doesn’t protect at all.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] true or not, it has been found that circumcised men don’t reduce the risk for women though (Male Circumcision Doesn’t Cut Your HIV Risk). Now, new research has found that circumcision doesn’t reduce the risk of HIV spread among [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.