Skip to content

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

More About the EurekAlert! Smackdown

March 15, 2007 by Lei  
Filed under Health

campfireI’m almost embarrassed to still be on the EurekAlert! warpath, but I’ve received so much support that I can’t NOT say just a couple more things.

First, thank you to Shannon Nelson of Pierce Mattie Public Relations for bringing attention to the matter of blogger and blogging legitimacy. She interviewed me for the Pierce Mattie Fitness Division blog on this issue and about science and health blogging in general. I hope you’ll go by and take a look (warning: beware of my HUGE profile pic ;) )

Also, Tris and Bora have both received responses from EurekAlert! regarding their applications to be registered users. Their rejection letter differs significantly from mine, which shows that there has been some thinking going on behind the scenes although nothing substantial has changed.

FYI, I’ve shared my rejection letter and theirs below the fold. There’s no confidentality clause in the EurekAlert! emails.

Here’s the rejection letter I received from their Publications Assistant.

Dear Dr. Lei,

Thank you for your registration application and request for access to embargoed news through EurekAlert!. After careful consideration of your application, we have made the decision to decline your registration request. All registration decisions are made based upon our eligibility criteria, and your application does not appear to meet the necessary requirements at this time. Please note that you may still access the many public sections of our Web site, which include our Breaking News section, archive of 60,000+ press releases and more.

If you feel we have made this decision in error, please feel free to contact me with more information about your status as a journalist.

And here’s the letter Tris and Bora received from their Communications Officer (a higher rank than the writer of my letter, I think).

Greetings Mr. Hussey:

Thank you for your registration application and request for access to embargoed news through EurekAlert!. After careful consideration of your application, we have made the decision to decline your registration request. All registration decisions are made based upon our eligibility
criteria, and your application does not appear to meet the necessary requirements at this time.

EurekAlert! values and recognizes the diversity of the science journalism community. However, EurekAlert!’s policies regarding access to embargoed news, in adherence to Securities Exchange Act guidelines, outline that access is provided only for on-staff and freelance reporters, editors or producers employed by accredited news media outlets. All applicants and media outlets are reviewed based upon
objective criteria including, but not limited to: the volume and frequency of original news content produced; the nature of any professional roles assumed in addition to staff/freelance reporter; and the demonstrated need for access to embargoed information. While we value your interest in obtaining registered access to our Web site, we are bound to enforce our policies uniformly.

Please note that you may still access the many public sections of our Web site, which include our Breaking News section, archive of over 80,000 press releases and more.

On the one hand, I kind of don’t care anymore. On the other hand, I wish more of us science and health bloggers would speak up and cry foul. In the end, there’s still genetics, genes, and DNA to write about and in my mind, those subjects are far more fascinating and worthwhile.

Thanks again, everyone. I truly appreciate your continuing support.

Oh, and you want to know what’s really ironic? I’m #5 on a Google search for EurekAlert! (with and without the exclamation mark) with my positive review of their service. *sigh*

Update: Don’t miss Alun’s thoughtful post at Archaeoastronomy that considers the role of bloggers, science, media and the AAAS. Mel at Aesahaettr also has some cryptic comments on the situation. I’m still scratching my head…. And thanks also to Jeremy at Another Blasted Weblog for giving me some other good ideas about how to approach the situation.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

7 Responses to “More About the EurekAlert! Smackdown”
  1. Greg Laden says:

    But what do they say their criteria are? Are these stated at any point along the application process?

  2. Hey Greg, This is what it says on their registration page:

    *a staff reporter, editor, or producer specializing in science, medicine, or technology issues
    *a freelance writer, editor, or producer who regularly covers science, medicine, or technology issues
    *a public information officer for a university, research institution, scientific organization or corporation

    This is the only application you submit before getting dissed. ;)

  3. mel says:

    Reveal on the Æsahættr post:

    Just a little free association between the way EurekAlert discriminates in the release of embargoed information and the claim that some religions make of god … that god essentially does the same thing.

    If your not on god’s approved list then you’ll just have to get god’s communications/EurekAlerts second hand–if at all. :P

    IOW: EurekAlert is playing god.

  4. J Fox says:

    Actually, now you are at number 3 in Google’s results for EurekAlert. Irony or ignominy?

  5. Thomas A. Hart says:

    I just noticed the comment on Sept. 18 about your moving up to no. 3 position on Google. That’s where I noticed your site now.
    I’m sure I couldn’t get status as a journalist. I have on different occasions communicated with authors of research reported on Eurekalert and probably usually made them aware of their appearance there. Most replied and some clearly appreciated the input in one degree and another.
    Thomas A. Hart, Tennessee Division of Geology
    home tahart@bellsouth.net

  6. I cam across EurekaAlert by chance. Having read your blog and contacted http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2007/03/eurekalert_update.php
    in person I shall now see if I get rejected! I might well be!

    Yours very sincerely

    Jacyntha Crawley
    (international author)

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] Does Advancing Product Advance Science? 15 03 2007 I’ve said I’m not writing, but I’m still reading. There’s a rumpus about accreditation for bloggers at Eurekalert! In an ideal world I’d want to re-write this to include references to later posts like More About the EurekAlert! Smackdown. It’s not going to happen for quite a while though, so I thought to post what I have while it’s still timely rather than wait till I can finish it. Stop, one way. Photo (cc) David Dennis. [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.