<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MRI Detects More Breast Cancer in High-risk Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:47:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grand Rounds at the Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/comment-page-1/#comment-44625</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Rounds at the Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/08/03/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women/#comment-44625</guid>
		<description>[...] Gamat over at Cancer Commentary takes a look at MRI and breast cancer detection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gamat over at Cancer Commentary takes a look at MRI and breast cancer detection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/comment-page-1/#comment-44755</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/08/03/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women/#comment-44755</guid>
		<description>i suspected too that MRI is the most expensive screening method. thanks dean for confirming. yes, trisha, i wonder too if insurance companies are paying (or will pay) for MRI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suspected too that MRI is the most expensive screening method. thanks dean for confirming. yes, trisha, i wonder too if insurance companies are paying (or will pay) for MRI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/comment-page-1/#comment-44749</link>
		<dc:creator>Trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/08/03/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women/#comment-44749</guid>
		<description>I suspect that MRI costs more - which makes me wonder, are insurance companies paying for it yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that MRI costs more &#8211; which makes me wonder, are insurance companies paying for it yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women-57/comment-page-1/#comment-44677</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/08/03/mri-detects-more-breast-cancer-in-high-risk-women/#comment-44677</guid>
		<description>MRI by far is the more expensive test, which is why it is not recommended as a routine diagnostic tool for women who are not at higher-than-usual risk for breast cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRI by far is the more expensive test, which is why it is not recommended as a routine diagnostic tool for women who are not at higher-than-usual risk for breast cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>