Skip to content

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

No health insurance = more home births

December 30, 2008 by Marijke Durning, RN  
Filed under Women's Health

It may not have been planned that way, but could the lack of health insurance or under-insurance of millions of Americans be resulting in more home births?

If so, this could be both good and bad.

First the good: Many women want to give birth at home. A home birth gives them more control over the natural process and they feel it’s a better experience all around.

Now the bad: Some women, due to difficulties or health issues, shouldn’t be giving birth at home without putting themselves or their baby at risk.

According to this Salt Lake City Tribune article, More moms choose to give birth at home, some women and their partners are considering the thousands of dollars for a hospital to be a luxury and they’re opting for less expensive, midwife-led labor and deliveries.

While home births may be the right thing, money shouldn’t be the deciding factor. To me, there’s something wrong with that picture.

~~~~

Tags: , , , ,

  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

One Response to “No health insurance = more home births”
  1. Sarah Supernova says:

    I agree with you. I’d love to see more women choosing home births, but money shouldn’t be the deciding factor. There are definitely some situations (though a pretty small percentage) that need hospital interventions.

    But I’d sure love to see more women freely and happily choosing homebirth and making sure they have healthy diets, exercise and healthy pregnancy!!

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme | Sitemap


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.