Sex-Ed: Abstinence Only, or Full Disclosure?
October 19, 2007 by Kristen King
Filed under Women's Health
It’s an issue of social responsibility as well as ethical, and it doesn’t appear that a resolution will be coming any time soon. It’s complex and multifaceted. It’s highly controversial. It’s sex ed.
Part of the problem is that there are a lot of unanswered questions about sex education. Who’s responsibility is it? When does someone else step in if that party isn’t getting the job done? Who decides what qualifies as getting the job done? At what age should sex ed begin? Should abstinence be the only curriculum, or should kids learn about safe sex, too? Should it be a political issue? And are the stakes higher as a result of the staggering effects of teen pregnancy in the US?
An op-ed piece by Amanda Robb in yesterday’s New York Times blasts abstinence-only education as being ineffective and as teaching “patently false information.” What do you think? Would kids be better off without abstinence-only sex ed? Should sex ed be mandatory? When should it begin? How long should it last? Leave your opinions in the comments.
Contents © Copyright 2007 Kristen King
Comments
3 Responses to “Sex-Ed: Abstinence Only, or Full Disclosure?”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying about this post...[...] aside, what does this mean for the sexual and emotional health of our children? What role does sex ed play? What can parents do to educate and protect their kids? What do you [...]
[...] is a topic we discussed on Lively Women not too long [...]
[...] the Rise in the US, Condoms to Be Distributed in Public Places in the UK – LW December 2007 – Sex-Ed: Abstinence Only, or Full Disclosure? – LW October 2007 – How Young Is Too Young for Birth Control? – LW October 2007 – Teen [...]