True or false: It’s better to be psycho for houses or psycho for love?

May 4, 2008 by Jennifer Chait  
Filed under Home & Living

This May the entire Lifestyles Channel is doing a month long theme event called “Three Doors Down.” The idea; sort of a meet & greet (and introduction) deal among blogs in our b5media channel.

I’ll be introducing you to one new blog a week here at Offbeat. Each of the blogs is one of my neighboring blogs - from three blogs down of course. Fittingly, I decided to give each of my neighbor blogs a house that’s appropriate for their blog.

This week, I’m kicking off the event with Psycho for Love. Not a blog I read normally, because frankly, to answer the question posed in my post title, I think it’s better to be psycho for houses, or any structure really, than love. Why? Well…

  • So not into stalker people - however stalking homes is a fun pastime activity.
  • We could flip the question as well. Even psycho homes themselves are better than psycho people. A psycho house will do no harm; a psycho person just might, in fact, they probably will. Even if you’re dealing in truly psycho homes; think Amityville, really what’s the house gonna do that I can’t solve with a match and some lighting fluid? I can take a house.
  • Me being overly amused with all things structural gives me a nice topic to discuss at parties and other events. The psycho for love individual cannot bring up their issues at a get-together, not if they don’t want to raise a few eyebrows.
  • Seriously, when have you ever seen a psycho home lover arrested for some MySpace crime? Oh, what’s that, you haven’t. That’s right, I’m practically 99.8% less likely to end up in jail than a psycho for love person.

Best answer: True; it’s so much better to be psycho for houses.

Disagree? Then you might like Psycho for Love , a blog blogged by Trench, a blogger I like actually (i.e. not psycho). Topics covered include things like:

I know; wrap your brain around this blog, right.

In any case I have a nice house in mind for Trench. I can’t remember if I’ve shown this house at Offbeat before or not, but I’ve been psycho for it, for a good long while. It’s one of the weirdest I’ve seen, plus a wee bit incognito, thus fitting.
Mushroom House by The Rocketeer:

1117993812_914bb5a759.jpg

[photo via eBestAgent]

Weigh in with a comment: psycho for houses or psycho for love? Go ahead and choose.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Kirtsy
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Comments

6 Responses to “True or false: It’s better to be psycho for houses or psycho for love?”
  1. Hil says:

    Why not both? There’s more than enough crazy to go around.

  2. Hil, you hardly seem the psycho for love type. I’m gonna guess there’s not that much crazy going around, at least not around you. Maybe though, I’ll do a link love post for you here, I actually have an offbeat space that would be perfect for eco friendly driver.

  3. Gayla McCord says:

    Love the way you worked that into your theme. You are SO creative.

  4. Jennifer says:

    Thanks Gayla, of course, you didn’t give an answer. Love or house? With you I’m gonna guess love, but not of the very psycho variety :)

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] of my neighboring blogs via the Lifestyles Channel Three Doors Down event. Last week we looked at Psycho for Love. This week, something a little less psycho, and more fun; Play Library. Play Library covers the [...]

  2. [...] True or false: It’s better to be psycho for houses or psycho for love? [...]



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!


About Us | Advertise with us | Blog for Blisstree | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Get This Theme


All content is Copyright © 2005-2009 b5media. All rights reserved.