Comments on: Working Mother Magazine’s 2007 100 Best Companies List

By: Florinda

Florinda — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:16:16 +0000

You make some great points – if a “benefit” can’t benefit all employees, how big a benefit is it, really? Also, as you say, some of the benefits aren’t all that big to begin with. And yes, ALL employees – fathers too, although they don’t need the lactation room. Shouldn’t we be thinking in “family-friendly,” not just “mom-friendly,” terms by now?

By: Devra

Devra — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:33:05 +0000

Go check out what Becky has been writing about the list on her site http://www.deepmuckbigrake.com as she is doing a series on the list. Thanks for the linky love, I share the same concerns about the list as you. And what bugs me as well is there are some companies on the list who do deserve to legitimately be there, but because there are others who do not have such stellar programs, the entire list loses integrity which is a big bummer.

By: AARP Best Employers 2007

AARP Best Employers 2007 — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:26:51 +0000

[...] 50, so, I don’t have first hand experience, but, I hope this listing doesn’t have the controversy that the Working Mother Magazine’s 100 Best Companies 2007 List [...]