Pregnant Man Has Baby Girl
July 4, 2008 by Eliza Ferree
Filed under News & Media
The pregnant man known as Thomas Beattie has given birth to a little girl. Thomas went in under a disguise and was quietly admitted into the hospital, the staff even closed off his room away from the other women.
Many believed that Thomas would deliver by c-section but reports are now coming out that he may not have. ABC has reported that it was natural, course no one states by vaginal or with or without drugs.
However, according to TMZ.com the baby was delivered by c-section. I’m leaning more towards this, but guess we’ll hear more in a day or two. So far no stats were given on the baby girl’s name, weight or anything except that she was happy, healthy baby. I have heard that Thomas has already been released from the hospital, he originally went in on Monday. This is one birth that has definitely made history, whether we agree that it was a man giving birth, a transgender giving birth or a woman giving birth.
Thanks for reporting it as a man!
Thomas Beattie is not a man. Taking hormones and having a mastectomy doesn’t make someone a biological male. Therefore its not the first man to have a baby, because he’s/she is not a male. I do wish the happy couple all the best, and hope they get some privacy from the media.
Bizarre. Poor child.
Thomas is not a man. A man cannot have a baby. I am glad she had a healthy baby girl. I wish them the best and a happy family.
WUT A WEIRDO !THERS NO WAY THAT A GUY CAN HAVE A BABY
Glad for them….He views himself as a man so therefore he IS a man. Trans people go through tremendous mental aguish and to go to the lengths he did to become a man he should be recognized as a man. People need to expand their minds and realize gender is not black and white, it is a continuim.
Just because she views herself as a man does not make this person a man. God created this woman and a woman she will always be no matter how hard she tries to deny it. If I view my self as a saltine cracker does that mean I am a saltine cracker? No! It means I am a seriously ill person in need of mental help. This country, (or should I say world?) has lost all sense of right and wrong. God have mercy on us. We need it.
We can have our names changed. We can be recognized as common law married,or say, (pretending to be), so where is it so wrong that he prefer to be a man? Or (pretending to be)? He has married a woman, and there are very few states that would allow that, my guess is that he is indeed…. considered a MAN!
Ok..for one thing. It’s a lie. He or she or whatever still has female organs!! So just because it got its boobs removed and has facial hair it’s a man? Yea right. This is disgusting. Having a child is suppose to be something beautiful, not a FREAK of nature!
I dont want to hurt any bodys feelings, so if u get hurt–my bad. I would say it is 50% male and 50% female. becuz in order to be a full male you have to have x and y chromosones. so if you cant shoot sperm naturally—you are NOT a MAN. get over it! therefore the headline should not be:”First Man to Have Baby” but it should be “First Transvestite to Have Baby”. Anything else is absurd. And if you disagree then you should go back to the 5th grade and take puberty over again. By da way if Thomas was married to the woman then he must have cheated on her to get pregnant? Becuz it would make more sense to have the sperm donated to the wife. right?
All of yall are wrong. Its a half male and half female. I give him credit for having his nutts, but he still has two eggs. To be a male you have to be able to produce sperm. Yall need to go back to 5th grade and learn puberty all over again, and stop being so retarted. the real title should be: “First Transgender to Have Baby.” not “First Man to have Baby”. Believe stuff like that is just ignorance and shallow-minded.