Cost of Giving Birth at the Hospital or at Home
September 21, 2008 by Angela White, J.D., breastfeeding counselor
Filed under breastfeeding, pregnancy, scientific studies
One study published in the Journal of Nurse Midwifery found:
The average uncomplicated vaginal birth costs 68% less in a home than in a hospital, and births initiated in the home offer a lower combined rate of intrapartum and neonatal mortality and a lower incidence of cesarean delivery.
“The Cost-Effectiveness of Home Birth.” J Nurse Midwifery. 1999 Jan-Feb;44(1):30-5. Gee, what a novel concept — care that costs less but has a better outcome!
I did an informal survey of sources online to determine that the average hospital birth costs around $8,000 in the United States, depending on exactly where the mother lives. That does not include the additional costs of an epidural or cesarean section, nor does it include the prenatal care from a physician, which costs anywhere from $1,500 to $3,000. For the sake of discussion, let’s say the total cost of prenatal care and physician-assisted hospital birth is approximately $10,000. Compare that to my prenatal care and home birth with a midwife, which cost a total of $4,300. That’s $5,700 — nearly 60% — less! And I was far happier with my home birth experience than my two hospital birth experiences.
Guess how much of that $4,300 my insurance company covered? $2,947.08. Compare that to what the insurance company theoretically would have paid for physician-assisted hospital birth: $8,000! By that token, the insurance company should have been paying ME to have a home birth. My choice of home birth saved the company over $5,000. And the irony is, I had to fight to get the company to cover a home birth at all. Because there were in-network midwives who could attend births at a hospital, the insurance company initially denied my request for a homebirth. I had to have my midwife write a letter to the company stating that I had a “medical need” for a homebirth (basically we argued that I had had such bad hospital experiences — with a fourth-degree tear and a failed epidural — that for my mental health I needed a home birth!) Luckily, the company agreed to pay, although I had to pay 25% co-insurance, rather than 20% co-insurance for an in-network provider. In the end, I wound up paying about $450 less out of pocket for a homebirth, and had a safe and satisfying birth.
My homebirths ran about 2,000.00 total. I had 6 at home and 2 (the first two) in the hospital.
Guess which I liked better?
Oh, BTW..we don;t have insurance..never have…if I had had insuarnce my out of pocket would have been about 250.00
apparently the mid-wifery movement is a growing one that has historically faced a lot of opposition from the medical establishment. more coverage of how mid-wives are beneficial, safe and cost-effective would help this cause of reducing runaway medical costs.