<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chocolate Bytes &#187; milky-way-bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/tag/milky-way-bar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes</link>
	<description>All About Chocolate - Delicious Chocolate Recipes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dark Chocolate is Delicious and&#8230; Taxable?</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/dark-chocolate-is-delicious-and-taxable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/dark-chocolate-is-delicious-and-taxable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather R.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chocolate Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chocolate Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chocolate-Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa-sales-tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milky-way-bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roth-and-co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxgirl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chocolatebytes.com/dark-chocolate-is-delicious-and-taxable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Via Taxgirl.com: in Iowa, a Milky Way Dark candy bar is taxable, but a classic milk chocolate Milky Way is not. 
What? Yeah, I know.
The confusion apparently stems from Iowa&#8217;s definition of candy, sales tax laws, and the inclusion (or exclusion) of flour. You can read the whole thing at Roth &#038; Co. (And while you&#8217;re there you can read about Iowa getting themselves in a bunch over taxing pumpkins: for carving or for food.)
&#8230;..

Post from: Chocolate Bytes
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes">Chocolate Bytes</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align='center'><img src='http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/files/2007/11/milkyway.jpg' alt='milky way bar' /></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.taxgirl.com/is-dark-chocolate-really-less-of-a-tax-burden/">Taxgirl.com</a>: in <strong>Iowa</strong>, a Milky Way Dark candy bar is taxable, but a classic milk chocolate Milky Way is not. </p>
<p>What? Yeah, I know.</p>
<p>The confusion apparently stems from <strong>Iowa&#8217;s definition of candy</strong>, sales tax laws, and the inclusion (or exclusion) of flour. You can read the whole thing at <a href="http://www.rothcpa.com/archives/003084.php#003084">Roth &#038; Co.</a> (And while you&#8217;re there you can read about Iowa getting themselves in a bunch over taxing pumpkins: <a href="http://www.rothcpa.com/archives/003080.php#003080">for carving or for food</a>.)</p>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
<p align='center'><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/november-chocolate-bytes-contest/"><img src='http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/files/2007/11/chocolate_bytes_contest.jpg' alt='chocolate bytes contest' border=0 /></a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes">Chocolate Bytes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/chocolatebytes/dark-chocolate-is-delicious-and-taxable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>