<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; breast-cancer-risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/breast-cancer-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hormone Therapy for Younger Women</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/hormone-therapy-for-younger-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/hormone-therapy-for-younger-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cherie Burbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast-cancer-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers of estrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health risks of horome replacement for younger women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hormone replacement therapy for women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=107645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every day, it seems, we get another opinion on the role of hormone therapy and how it affects women.  We&#8217;ve heard that hormone replacement therapy can increase the risk of heart attacks and cancer for women.  But one doctor now says that might not be the case for women, or at least, younger women.

Dr. Leon Speroff maintains that heart attack risk increased after the age of 70 for women.  He also says a &#8220;number of studies indicate estrogen therapy very likely does reduce heart disease in women under 60.&#8221;  
Furthermore, he says estrogen doesn&#8217;t increase the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/hormone-therapy-for-younger-women/">Hormone Therapy for Younger Women</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day, it seems, we get another opinion on the role of hormone therapy and how it affects women.  We&#8217;ve heard that hormone replacement therapy can increase the risk of heart attacks and cancer for women.  But <a href="http://journalstar.com/news/local/article_a6ba8f90-8a00-11de-a130-001cc4c002e0.html">one doctor</a> now says that might not be the case for women, or at least, younger women.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/08/191868_birth_control.jpg" alt="191868_birth_control" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-107644" /></p>
<p>Dr. Leon Speroff maintains that heart attack risk increased after the age of 70 for women.  He also says a &#8220;number of studies indicate estrogen therapy very likely does reduce heart disease in women under 60.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Furthermore, he says estrogen doesn&#8217;t increase the risk of cancer, per se, but makes the growth of a tumor already there to get larger more quickly.</p>
<p><em>Image: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/191868">sxc.hu</a>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/hormone-therapy-for-younger-women/">Hormone Therapy for Younger Women</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/hormone-therapy-for-younger-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insulin Linked to Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cherie Burbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast-cancer-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[causes of breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangers of high levels of insulin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulin linked to breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard the link between obesity and breast cancer, but new research suggests there is a correlation between insulin and higher breast cancer risk.  This is an important finding because the insulin link was prevalent even in women who were not overweight. 

According to one study, an &#8220;analysis of 5450 women shows that higher circulating insulin levels lead to twice the likelihood of breast cancer.&#8221;  In postmenopausal women, higher insulin levels contributed to the risk even among women of a normal weight.  This research seems to confirm that a healthy diet (which can keep insulin levels down) [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/">Insulin Linked to Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve heard the link between obesity and breast cancer, but new research suggests there is a correlation between insulin and higher breast cancer risk.  This is an important finding because the insulin link was prevalent even in women who were not overweight. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/07/216855_breast_cancer_bands_3.jpg" alt="216855_breast_cancer_bands_3" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-98999" /></p>
<p>According to one study, an &#8220;<a href="http://www.emaxhealth.com/1020/98/32199/breast-cancer-linked-higher-insulin-levels.html">analysis of 5450 women shows that higher circulating insulin levels lead to twice the likelihood of breast cancer</a>.&#8221;  In postmenopausal women, higher insulin levels contributed to the risk even among women of a normal weight.  This research seems to confirm that a healthy diet (which can keep insulin levels down) is all the more important for women.</p>
<p><em>Image:  <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/216855">sxc.hu</a>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/">Insulin Linked to Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/insulin-linked-to-breast-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunlight Against Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/sunlight-against-breast-cancer-57/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/sunlight-against-breast-cancer-57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Gamat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancerOn-breast-cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast-cancer-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunlight-exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vitamin-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[~ Anti-cancer treatments ~]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/08/09/sunlight-against-breast-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While avoiding too much sunshine will reduce one’s risk of skin cancer, it will on the other hand increase one’s risk of breast cancer.
The majority of vitamin D comes from exposure of the skin to sunlight but many women – exposed less in winter and reluctant to bare themselves in summer because of the dangers – are deficient.
There has been anecdotal evidence to suggest that breast cancer is less common among women who live closer to the Equator, where the sunshine is stronger.
But a new study conducted by Creighton University provided evidence that the lower the levels of vitamin D [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/sunlight-against-breast-cancer-57/">Sunlight Against Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While avoiding too much sunshine will reduce one’s risk of skin cancer, it will on the other hand increase one’s risk of breast cancer.</p>
<blockquote><p>The majority of vitamin D comes from exposure of the skin to sunlight but many women – exposed less in winter and reluctant to bare themselves in summer because of the dangers – are deficient.</p>
<p>There has been anecdotal evidence to suggest that breast cancer is less common among women who live closer to the Equator, where the sunshine is stronger.</p></blockquote>
<p>But a new study conducted by <a href="http://www2.creighton.edu/">Creighton University</a> provided evidence that <strong>the lower the levels of vitamin D in a woman’s blood-stream, the greater the risk of her developing breast cancer at post-menopausal stage</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Our findings of decreased all-cancer risk with improved vitamin D status are consistent with a large and still growing body of epidemiologic and observational data showing that cancer risk, cancer mortality, or both are inversely associated with solar exposure, vitamin D status, or both.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Sunshine is the major source of <strong>Vitamin D</strong> (where Vitamin D is manufactured in the skin by exposure to sunlight),  but it is also present in foods such as milk, eggs, oily fish, green vegetables and fortified margarines.</p>
<p>I remember what one commenter her said…something like you really cannot win: one thing may be bad for something but good for another.</p>
<p>Sunlight is the perfect example. Expose yourself to it, you get skin cancer but not breast cancer -according to this study&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p>But I guess you can think of ways to benefit from both. Like if you are brown like me, I should already have a built-in protection from the harmful rays of the sun. Or maybe live in the tropics… or something.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2195614.ece">Times Online</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/sunlight-against-breast-cancer-57/">Sunlight Against Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/sunlight-against-breast-cancer-57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy Could Mean Lower Risk of Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer-57/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer-57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Gamat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancerOn-breast-cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast-cancer-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nausea/vomiting-at-pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cancercommentary.com/2007/06/24/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women who suffered morning sickness during pregnancy may actually be fortunate because this could mean 30% lower risk of breast cancer later in life compared to those who had nausea-free pregnancies.
[I had a nausea-free pregnancy you know!]
Such were the findings of University of Buffalo epidemiologists, recently presented at the Society for Epidemiologic Research&#8217;s annual meeting in Boston.
According to David Jaworowicz, Jr., first author on the study and a doctoral candidate in the Department of Social Preventive Medicine in UB&#8217;s School of Public Health and Health Professions:
&#8220;Although the exact mechanism responsible for causing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy has yet to [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer-57/">Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy Could Mean Lower Risk of Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women who suffered morning sickness during pregnancy may actually be fortunate because this could mean 30% lower risk of breast cancer later in life compared to those who had nausea-free pregnancies.</p>
<p>[I had a nausea-free pregnancy you know!]</p>
<p>Such were the findings of <a href="http://www.buffalo.edu">University of Buffalo</a> epidemiologists, recently presented at the <a href="http://www.epiresearch.org/">Society for Epidemiologic Research</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.epiresearch.org/meeting/">annual meeting in Boston</a>.</p>
<p>According to David Jaworowicz, Jr., first author on the study and a doctoral candidate in the Department of Social Preventive Medicine in UB&#8217;s School of Public Health and Health Professions:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Although the exact mechanism responsible for causing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy has yet to be pinpointed, it likely is a result of changing levels of ovarian and placental hormone production, which may include higher circulating levels of a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin. In vitro studies have shown that this hormone possesses several activities that have potential protective effects against cancer cells.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The said study was based on data from participants in the Western New York Exposure and Breast Cancer Study &#8211; a population-based case-control study of breast cancer conducted in women 35-79 from two Western New York counties between 1996 and 2001.</p>
<p>No cause for alarm though because the researchers admit that these were only preliminary findings: based mainly upon whether women &#8220;ever&#8221; experienced these conditions vs. &#8220;never&#8221; during any of their pregnancies.</p>
<p>Find more details from the <a href="http://www.buffalo.edu/news/8704">full report</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer-57/">Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy Could Mean Lower Risk of Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/nausea-and-vomiting-during-pregnancy-could-mean-lower-risk-of-breast-cancer-57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Meat and Risk of Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/385-57/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/385-57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gloria Gamat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancerOn-breast-cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast-cancer-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processed-meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read-meat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancercommentary.com/2007/04/11/385/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A woman’s chance of developing breast cancer is greatly increased by eating red meat.
But don’t we know that already?  
However, a University of Leeds research found a striking association in post-menopausal women.
…those with the highest intake of red meat, the equivalent to one portion a day (more than 57 grams) &#8211; run a 56 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who eat none.
Women who eat the most processed meat, such as bacon, sausages, ham or pies, run a 64 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who eat none.
This recent finding was derived from [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/385-57/">Red Meat and Risk of Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman’s chance of developing breast cancer is greatly increased by eating red meat.</p>
<p>But don’t we know that already? <img src='http://www.blisstree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, a <a href="http://www.leeds.ac.uk/">University of Leeds</a> research found a striking association in post-menopausal women.</p>
<blockquote><p>…those with the highest intake of red meat, the equivalent to one portion a day (more than 57 grams) &#8211; run a 56 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who eat none.</p>
<p>Women who eat the most processed meat, such as bacon, sausages, ham or pies, run a 64 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who eat none.</p></blockquote>
<p>This <a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v96/n7/full/6603689a.html">recent finding</a> was derived from the eating habits and health of 35,000 women for the past seven years (earlier findings showed that pre-menopausal women who have the greatest intake of fibre have cut their risk of breast cancer in half) and published in the <a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc">British Journal of Cancer</a>.</p>
<p>I guess we ladies should just stay away from red meat and processed meats (these, I admit is too hard to stay away from!).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070407174018.htm">Source</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/385-57/">Red Meat and Risk of Breast Cancer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/385-57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>