<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; compatible partners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/compatible-partners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>eHarmony Settles Discrimination Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit-45/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit-45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books, Magazines, Newspapers, & Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatible partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eharmony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay and lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datingdames.com/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While researching eHarmony recently I noticed that there was no option for men seeking men or women seeking women. eHarmony was not a service for same-sex match ups. I was surprised by that, just as I am always surprised and dismayed by exclusion and/or prejudice against people who are gay.  Everybody wants somebody to love, everybody deserves somebody to love. It&#8217;s simple. Right?
Apparently, excluding gay and lesbian daters is turning out to be rather expensive. Today, I read that a Law Against Discrimination suit was filed against eHarmony after Eric McKinley was not allowed to contact another man on the site in 2005.

In [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit-45/">eHarmony Settles Discrimination Suit</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>While researching eHarmony recently</strong> <strong>I noticed that there was <em>no</em> option for men seeking men or women seeking women.</strong> eHarmony was not a service for same-sex match ups. I was surprised by that, just as I am always surprised and dismayed by exclusion and/or prejudice against people who are gay.  Everybody <strong>wants</strong> somebody to love, everybody <strong>deserves</strong> somebody to love. It&#8217;s simple. Right?</p>
<p>Apparently, excluding gay and lesbian daters is turning out to be rather expensive. Today, <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/eharmony-preps-gay-dating-site-after-settling-discrimination-suit-042088/">I read that a Law Against Discrimination suit was filed </a>against eHarmony after Eric McKinley was not allowed to contact another man on the site in 2005.</p>
<blockquote>
<p hasbox="2">In July &#8216;07, the DCR issued a Finding of Probable Cause that eHarmony had violated the LAD, prompting the company to file a Motion for Reconsideration of the finding. (The motion was pending at the time of the settlement.)</p>
<p hasbox="2">Under the terms of the settlement, the company will pay him $5,000, plus dues of 10 times that amount to the state division to cover administrative costs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p hasbox="2">As part of the settlement, <strong>eHarmony will be launching a site for same-sex daters called </strong><a href="http://www.compatiblepartners.net/"><strong>Compatible Partners </strong></a><strong>by March 31</strong>. In addition, <strong>they will be offering 10,000 free 6-month subscriptions</strong>. This is a step in the right direction, but I would feel better about the company if they had been open to everybody in the first place. </p>
<p hasbox="2">You can sign up to be notified when Compatible Partners goes live <a href="http://www.compatiblepartners.net/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit-45/">eHarmony Settles Discrimination Suit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/eharmony-settles-discrimination-suit-45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>