- 88 days ago by Samantha Escobar
- No Comments »
- Share a Tip
Being “cruelly mocked” is basically like encouragement, right? More
Going off the Grid: I’m Not a Hippie, I Just Needed to Mend a Broken Heart
According To NH Politician, We’re All Just Walking Vaginas
Unbelievable Opportunists Selling Boston Marathon Memorabilia On Ebay To Make a Buck Off Bombing
Megan Draper’s Miscarriage Confession Really Hit Home For Me
Dove’s “Real Beauty Sketches” Show You’re Probably Much Lovelier Than You Think
30 By 30: Smiles At Every Size (How I Deal With Body Image)
Being “cruelly mocked” is basically like encouragement, right? More
Anjelica Huston has spoken openly about plastic surgery-including botox and collagen injections-but whatever interviews she’s given in the past about her looks, the Daily Mail‘s speculation about her looks at a recent showing of Smash in LA are still despicable. The headline alone is offensive: “Anjelica Huston, 61, becomes Hollywood’s latest pillow face victim as she displays her suspiciously plump cheeks,” it reads. But the article itself is nothing but an insult, embellished with past quotes about how she’s conformed to the Hollywood plastic surgery norm with age. More
If surveys that say women should start “aging gracefully” at 59 aren’t bad enough, the Daily Mail is here to clarify that there is no such thing as sexy old women. Just women who look amazing past the age of 60 because they’re “aging gracefully,” and those who apparently look terrible because they don’t conform to society’s ideas about what tone of lipstick or type of fabric they should wear. More
Oprah opened up about a breast cancer scare at a conference in Los Angeles last month, and she also told the New York Times about her struggles at the helm of OWN and O Magazine. The Daily Mail‘s summary is dramatized, as can be expected, but it also couches a pretty offensive dig at women who choose to focus on their careers, minus a family–in the form of scientific claims about breast cancer risk. More
Christina Aguilera wore two outfits that revealed her body shape at the American Music Awards last night. But what does it all mean? A chance to go on a Christina Aguilera weight snark at The Daily Mail, of course! Their interpretation of her “unapologetic” wardrobe is that it was an act of “defiance to the skinny”–because obviously, Christina Aguilera should be apologizing for her weight and wearing mumus while she whittles herself back down to teen Christina Aguilera weight. More
You know what’s awesome? Pizza. You know what’s not awesome? Practically fat-shaming somebody for eating pizza, but then patronizingly backing off because that person has lost weight, making it “understandable.” More
This is the most amazingly oblivious thing I’ve seen in a while: Peter Lloyd –Â a male writer skeptical of science saying “size matters“Â – has taken to the Daily Mail opinion pages to warn women we’re next! That’s right, ladies, if folks are gonna dare start suggesting that female pleasure might be affected by physiological reality, then men might just start critiquing women’s bodies. More
The Daily Mail is advertising ”high-tech, extreme corsets” for ladies looking to “(cash) in on this season’s hourglass trend.” Made by Italian company Oh My Corset!, these babies are constructed from the same material used in race cars, avalanche safety netting and scuba gear. Like wearing a sexy wet-suit! More
Crusading against the idea that all women over 30 are old hags has been something of a hobby horse of mine lately. It’s a fight that’s generally met with ‘Amen’s’ from Gen X and Y women and skepticism by similarly-aged men (note to guys: just because you personally don’t subscribe do the idea that it’s all downhill for women’s looks after 23 doesn’t mean we’re not bombarded with that message from myriad directions). Well, lo and behold — as if to perfectly illustrate my point — this Daily Mail article about how women worry about the visible effects of aging “at just 29 YEARS OLD.” Like so many pieces in our favorite tabloid, the writer is ostensibly credulous at this phenomenon while backhandedly exclaiming at how old and ugly 29-year-old women are. More
Clueless Mom Gives Birth on a Bike Without Realizing It
The Sweetest Twitter Marriage Proposal You’ll Ever See
True Or False: Marathoners Can Eat Whatever They Want
Why Don’t More Women Talk About Masturbation?
8 Things You Shouldn't Do Before Bed
Rumors of Jennifer Aniston‘s daily juice habits have spurred a new wave of headlines about celebrity juice detoxes, and as usual, there’s a lot of confusion and misinformation surrounding the trend. But Daily Mail‘s latest contribution is especially bad: Titled “Juicing can wreck your looks: Flaking skin, hair loss and rotting teeth. The latest A-list diet craze has some ugly side-effects,” it’s just a sneak-attack on women’s looks—in this case, Janice Dickinson’s—thinly veiled as helpful health advice. Sound familiar? More
Slow news day? Why not pick over celebrity photo galleries for photos that reveal their knee wrinkles, blow ‘em up, crop them, and talk about how ugly they are? Title it “Wrinkly, knobbly, saggy – meet the celebs going weak at the knees!” and you have a Daily Mail article that, while not 100% shocking coming from them, is definitely one of their biggest fails of late. We hardly think that the imperfections in Catherine Zeta-Jones‘ knees make a trend piece, but then…we also aren’t trawling pics of celebs’ bodies for flaws to report on. More
Is sex really all downhill from your late 20s? Our favorite website is reporting that women reach their “sexual peak” at 28 years old, men at age 33. More
There may as well be a sad face emoticon included in the title of Daily Mail‘s latest feature about “real women’s” bodies, “What pregnancy did to our bodies: Six brave mothers reveal the toll having a baby has taken on their figures.” We’ve seen this trick before–back when they wrote up a similar story about the average British woman’s weight, but even on the second try, they’re not quite getting it right. More
The Daily Mail is among the media outlets most obsessed with the no-makeup “trend”—headlines proclaiming shock over a new barefaced celebrity seem to surface on their website hourly—but unsurprisingly, they’ve also been using it as an opportunity to shamelessly bash female celebrities’ looks; especially the ones who happen to be older than 23. First, there was their embarrassing focus on Hilary Clinton‘s pared-down look (while discussing nuclear weapons); now, they’re bashing Stella McCartney for looking “older than her years” without makeup. More