<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; heart-attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/heart-attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Smoking Bans Mean Fewer Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/smoking-bans-mean-fewer-heart-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/smoking-bans-mean-fewer-heart-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marijke Durning, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=113953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More countries are beginning to ban smoking within certain types of buildings. There was a lot of resistance to smoking bans, particularly from bar and pub owners who felt they would be losing business if their patrons wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to smoke. While it may be true that some businesses suffered, others did well because non-smokers now could come in and be comfortable.
But do the bans affect health? Are people healthier because their access to smoking may be less than it was before. According to researchers, yes.
In a study, published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, North American [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/smoking-bans-mean-fewer-heart-attacks/">Smoking Bans Mean Fewer Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More countries are beginning to ban smoking within certain types of buildings. There was a lot of resistance to smoking bans, particularly from bar and pub owners who felt they would be losing business if their patrons wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to smoke. While it may be true that some businesses suffered, others did well because non-smokers now c<a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1151676"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-113954" src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/09/xchng_no_smoking.jpg" alt="xchng_no_smoking" width="300" height="295" /></a>ould come in and be comfortable.</p>
<p>But do the bans affect health? Are people healthier because their access to smoking may be less than it was before. According to researchers, yes.</p>
<p>In a study, published in <em><a href="http://americanheart.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&amp;item=824"><strong>Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association</strong></a>, </em>North American and European communities that had such bans had a 17% drop in heart attacks within the first year of the ban and a 36% drop after three years.</p>
<p>An interesting finding from this study was that it wasn&#8217;t just the smokers who were affected, it was the nonsmokers who would otherwise have been exposed to second-hand smoke. Nonsmokers who have this exposure have a 25% to 30% higher risk of developing heart disease than those nonsmokers who aren&#8217;t exposed.</p>
<p>Makes you wonder why it&#8217;s so hard to convince some people about the dangers of smoking.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">~~~~</p>
<p style="text-align: right">Image: StockXchng.com</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/smoking-bans-mean-fewer-heart-attacks/">Smoking Bans Mean Fewer Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/smoking-bans-mean-fewer-heart-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defibrillators Not as Effective for Women</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/defibrillators-not-as-effective-for-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/defibrillators-not-as-effective-for-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cherie Burbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defibrillators in women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease in Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how women respond to medical equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treating disease differently for women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=112783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study says that defibrillators may not work as well for women as they do for men.  In fact, women have not been tested on the product as much as men, either.  As we know, men and women are different, and testing needs to be done on each equally.  Too often men are the ones that try out new health products or procedures, only to find later that they don&#8217;t work as well on women.

New research says that &#8220;implantable defibrillators to protect against deadly heart rhythms do not prevent deaths in women with advanced heart failure.&#8221; [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/defibrillators-not-as-effective-for-women/">Defibrillators Not as Effective for Women</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study says that defibrillators may not work as well for women as they do for men.  In fact, women have not been tested on the product as much as men, either.  As we know, men and women are different, and testing needs to be done on each equally.  Too often men are the ones that try out new health products or procedures, only to find later that they don&#8217;t work as well on women.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/09/124840_medical_series_14.jpg" alt="124840_medical_series_14" width="224" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-112784" /></p>
<p>New research says that &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN14520683">implantable defibrillators to protect against deadly heart rhythms do not prevent deaths in women with advanced heart failure.</a>&#8221;  These types of defibrillators are inserted into the body and help to restore a normal heartbeat.  They work differently in women, and scientists now realize they need to study the effects on women more closely.</p>
<p><em>Image:  <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/124840">sxc.hu.</a></em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/defibrillators-not-as-effective-for-women/">Defibrillators Not as Effective for Women</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/defibrillators-not-as-effective-for-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chocolate After Heart Attack = Good Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/chocolate-after-heart-attack-good-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/chocolate-after-heart-attack-good-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marijke Durning, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark-chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milk chocolate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=112648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chocolate lovers have another reason to celebrate their favorite treat: eating chocolate after a first heart attack may actually improve your survival rate.
Researchers in Sweden followed over 1000 men and women who had experienced a first-ever heart attack. Besides the usual types of questions asked in health questionnaires, these patients were asked about eating habits, including chocolate consumption.
Three months after their discharge from the hospital, the patients were examined and then they were followed by researchers for the next eight years. According to the study findings, which were published in the most recent issue of the Journal of Internal Medicine, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/chocolate-after-heart-attack-good-thing/">Chocolate After Heart Attack = Good Thing</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chocolate lovers have another reason to celebrate their favorite treat: eating chocolate after a first heart attack may actually improve your survival rate.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-112650" src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/09/chocolate2.jpg" alt="SchokoladenstÂ¸ckchen" width="173" height="129" />Researchers in Sweden followed over 1000 men and women who had experienced a first-ever heart attack. Besides the usual types of questions asked in health questionnaires, these patients were asked about eating habits, including chocolate consumption.</p>
<p>Three months after their discharge from the hospital, the patients were examined and then they were followed by researchers for the next eight years. According to the study findings, which were published in the most recent issue of the <em>J<a href="http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/spb/ovidweb.cgi?&amp;S=GGFJFPDMLPDDPEGJNCFLFHCKDJGCAA00&amp;Abstract=S.sh.15.16|4|1"><strong>ournal of Internal Medicine</strong></a></em>, the people who ate the most chocolate had the highest survival rates.</p>
<p>Those people who ate chocolate twice or more a week had a 66% reduced risk of dying from a heart attack than those who didn&#8217;t eat chocolate; those who at it once a <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-112651" src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/09/chocolate.jpg" alt="series object on white food - slab chocolate" width="186" height="123" />week had a 44% reduction in their risk of death from heart attack and those who ate it once a month  had a 27% reduction in risk.</p>
<p>This study is by no means definitive as there are many variables that weren&#8217;t taken into account, such as mental health. The researchers also didn&#8217;t qualify what type of chocolate was eaten and this could be an important factor because milk chocolate and dark chocolate are quite different in properties.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">~~~~</p>
<p style="text-align: right">Images: PhotoXpress.com</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/chocolate-after-heart-attack-good-thing/">Chocolate After Heart Attack = Good Thing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/chocolate-after-heart-attack-good-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avandia, Diabetes Drug, May Cause Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-diabetes-drug-may-cause-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-diabetes-drug-may-cause-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marijke Durning, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pioglitazone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosiglitazone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type-2-diabetes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=106531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avandia (rosiglitazone), a medication for people with type 2 diabetes, has been the subject of studies evaluating its safety and the results aren&#8217;t what Glaxo (the manufacturer) had hoped for. According to researchers in Toronto, Canada, elderly people who take Avandia may have an increased risk of heart failure and death.
The researchers didn&#8217;t, however, find the same results that American researchers found two years earlier, which suggested that Avandia also increased the risk of heart attacks. The Canadian researchers found no difference between patients who took Avandia and another type of medication, Actos (pioglitazone), and the rate of heart attacks [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-diabetes-drug-may-cause-problems/">Avandia, Diabetes Drug, May Cause Problems</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avandia (rosiglitazone), a medication for people with type 2 diabetes, has been the subject of studies evaluating its safety and the results aren&#8217;t what Glaxo (the manufacturer) had hoped for. According to researchers in Toronto, Canada, elderly people who take Avandia may have an increased risk of heart failure and death.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1062252"><img class="size-full wp-image-106532 alignleft" src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/08/xchng_happy_elderly_couple.jpg" alt="xchng_happy_elderly_couple" width="212" height="186" /></a>The researchers didn&#8217;t, however, find the same results that American researchers found two years earlier, which suggested that Avandia also increased the risk of heart attacks. The Canadian researchers found no difference between patients who took Avandia and another type of medication, Actos (pioglitazone), and the rate of heart attacks among them</p>
<p>The researchers studied 40,000 patients over the age of 65 who took Avandia or Actos. For every 93 patients, there was one more heart &#8220;event&#8221; or death each year among those who took Avandia.</p>
<p>This being said, this doesn&#8217;t mean that Avandia shouldn&#8217;t be used to treat type 2 diabetes. The results show that perhaps it shouldn&#8217;t be prescribed for people who are in high risk groups or who have heart disease already.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">~~~~</p>
<p style="text-align: right">Photo: StockXchng.com</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-diabetes-drug-may-cause-problems/">Avandia, Diabetes Drug, May Cause Problems</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-diabetes-drug-may-cause-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great News In Heart And Stroke Study</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jody</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cholesterol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strokes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2008/12/23/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From 1999 to 2006 the death rate of heart attacks and strokes fell about 30%. A cardiologist from UCLA said this is one of the outstanding achievements of modern history.
Even with this amazing news, the death count for Americans in 2006 from heart attacks and strokes was still at 829,072.
On an average one American dies from heart disease every 37 seconds.
A study on cholesterol levels in men men over 40 and women over 60 showed a 2% improvement. The same study showed no improvement in younger people. 
We also have a rise in children with high cholesterol, due to their [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study-50/">Great News In Heart And Stroke Study</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From 1999 to 2006 the death rate of heart attacks and strokes fell about 30%. A cardiologist from UCLA said this is one of the outstanding achievements of modern history.</p>
<p>Even with this amazing news, the death count for Americans in 2006 from heart attacks and strokes was still at 829,072.</p>
<p>On an average one American dies from heart disease every 37 seconds.</p>
<p>A study on cholesterol levels in men men over 40 and women over 60 showed a 2% improvement. The same study showed no improvement in younger people. </p>
<p>We also have a rise in children with high cholesterol, due to their eating habits and little or no exercise. Obesity is a major factor in children with high cholesterol, 4% of the children from 1971-74 were considered obese. The same study showed from 2003-06 a remarkable rise to 17%, of children that are obese.</p>
<p><strong><em>Results from two National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute studies show that in adults ages 33 to 45, 15% of men and 5.1% of women already had calcification and 1.6% had a calcification score above 100, which may indicate a significant burden of plaque.</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-sci-heart16-2008dec16,0,4082880.story"><font color="#ff0000">http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-sci-heart16-2008dec16,0,4082880.story</font></a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study-50/">Great News In Heart And Stroke Study</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/great-news-in-heart-and-stroke-study-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working the nightshift&#8230; stay on your toes for that code blue!</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nurses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2008/10/18/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This made me sit up and take notice since I used to work nights in the hospital…
The graveyard shift is the worst time to call code blue, a new study finds. Patients who go into cardiac arrest while in the hospital are more likely to die if it happens after 11 p.m., when staffing may be lower or patients are watched less closely. 
The ER is the only place that there was no difference in death rates. Among day shifts in all other units hospital wide the success rate of patients that cardiac arrested was 20% and the night shift [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue-50/">Working the nightshift&#8230; stay on your toes for that code blue!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This made me sit up and take notice since I used to work nights in the hospital…</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>The graveyard shift is the worst time to call code blue, a new study finds. Patients who go into cardiac arrest while in the hospital are more likely to die if it happens after 11 p.m., when staffing may be lower or patients are watched less closely. </strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>The ER is the only place that there was no difference in death rates. Among day shifts in all other units hospital wide the success rate of patients that cardiac arrested was 20% and the night shift rate was 15%. Either way it is not real good odds but I would take the first over the latter.</p>
<p>Why the difference? I would suppose most would blame it on fatigue and lower staff numbers. Interesting enough, while weekends had lower success rated then weekdays they were not nearly as pronounced as night versus day.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/nation/5563869.html">Houston Chronicle</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue-50/">Working the nightshift&#8230; stay on your toes for that code blue!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/working-the-nightshift-stay-on-your-toes-for-that-code-blue-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Got A Wii!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/i-got-a-wii-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/i-got-a-wii-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas_morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game_players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo_wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovering_stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel_southwest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2007/12/17/i-got-a-wii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a very exciting update to share with you! This is not groundbreaking research but I am so happy I just have to share. I wrote about the Nintendo Wii being used as therapy for recovering stroke and cardiac patients last week, and shared my strong want for one of these fabulous little game players. Well, guess what?  My brother in law found one today at normal price and offered it up! So yup I am going to get myself in my caravanarama with cash in hand and travel southwest to his house and pick it up.
Oh boy, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/i-got-a-wii-50/">I Got A Wii!!!!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2007/12/smiley-faces.jpg" title="smiley-faces.jpg" alt="smiley-faces.jpg" align="right" />I have a very exciting update to share with you! This is not groundbreaking research but I am so happy I just have to share. <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/2007/12/07/nintendos-wii-proves-to-help-in-physical-therapy-for-post-heart-surgery-patients/">I wrote about the Nintendo Wii </a>being used as therapy for recovering stroke and cardiac patients last week, and shared my strong want for one of these fabulous little game players. Well, guess what?  My brother in law found one today at normal price and offered it up! So yup I am going to get myself in my caravanarama with cash in hand and travel southwest to his house and pick it up.</p>
<p>Oh boy, I am so excited. I can&#8217;t play with it until after the kids pull it out from under the tree on Christmas morning. Who will be more excited- my hubby, the girls or me?? I will fill you in on my Wii fitness progress!</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/i-got-a-wii-50/">I Got A Wii!!!!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/i-got-a-wii-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Cup Soccer Stress Leads to Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular-disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifa-world-cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soccer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2006/06/23/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this for real?
Heart attacks could leap by 25 per cent if England crash out of the World Cup on penalties this weekend, say medical experts. 
And not only that, health experts claim &#8220;soccer stress&#8221; could lead to unhealthy and risky behaviors:

Binge-drinking
Eating fast food 
Increased smoking
Relationship stress
Mood swings
Aggression
Depression

I have seen firsthand the gloom and doom that accompanies the loss of a football game.  Then there&#8217;s the urban myth of increased wife beating on Superbowl Sundays.  What other side effects of sporting disappointment would you add to the list above?
More on World Cup-related heart health.
Lifestyle Extra, June 23, 2006
Post [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks-50/">World Cup Soccer Stress Leads to Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Football/Pix/pictures/2006/06/20/owengetchristofkoepsel.jpg" align="left" />Is this for real?</p>
<blockquote><p>Heart attacks could leap by 25 per cent if England crash out of the World Cup on penalties this weekend, say medical experts. </p></blockquote>
<p>And not only that, health experts claim &#8220;soccer stress&#8221; could lead to unhealthy and risky behaviors:</p>
<ul>
<li>Binge-drinking</li>
<li>Eating fast food </li>
<li>Increased smoking</li>
<li>Relationship stress</li>
<li>Mood swings</li>
<li>Aggression</li>
<li>Depression</li>
</ul>
<p>I have seen firsthand the <a href="http://www.thefootie.com/white-hart-pain/">gloom and doom</a> that accompanies the loss of a football game.  Then there&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp">urban myth</a> of increased wife beating on Superbowl Sundays.  <u>What other side effects of sporting disappointment would you add to the list above?</u></p>
<p>More on <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/index.php?s=world+cup">World Cup-related heart health</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowStory.asp?story=WS2226411N&#038;news_headline=heart_attacks_fear_if_england_pay_penalty">Lifestyle Extra</a>, June 23, 2006</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks-50/">World Cup Soccer Stress Leads to Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/world-cup-soccer-stress-leads-to-heart-attacks-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evista Does Not Prevent Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular-disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cholesterol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raloxifene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2006/04/13/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eli Lilly osteoporosis drug, Evista aka raloxifene, appears to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer but does not have any protective effects on the heart.  There were some signs in previous clinical trials that Evista was capable of reducing LDL cholesterol, but a recent study of 10,000 women did not show the same effects.
There was no difference in overall death or cardiovascular death among women who took Evista compared with those who took a placebo. The company said there was an increase in stroke mortality, although the overall incidence was low.
Sometimes it seems to me that testing to [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks-50/">Evista Does Not Prevent Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2006/04/evista.jpg" align="left" />Eli Lilly osteoporosis drug, Evista aka raloxifene, appears to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer but does <b>not</b> have any protective effects on the heart.  There were some signs in previous clinical trials that Evista was capable of reducing LDL cholesterol, but a recent study of 10,000 women did not show the same effects.</p>
<blockquote><p>There was <b>no difference in overall death or cardiovascular death among women who took Evista</b> compared with those who took a placebo. The company said there was an increase in stroke mortality, although the overall incidence was low.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes it seems to me that testing to see the various effects new pharmaceutical drugs may have is like a fishing expedition.  First, Evista was designed for osteoporosis then someone noticed that it may reduce the risk of heart attacks and even breast cancer.  So they begin to pursue these other lucrative uses as well.  Medical science does tend to be trial and error but I&#8217;m not sure I would want to enroll in these experimental studies.</p>
<p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/business/NewsArticle.aspx?type=businessIndustry&#038;storyID=2006-04-12T142012Z_01_N12277534_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPROIND-LILLY-DC.XML">Reuters</a>,  April 12, 2006</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks-50/">Evista Does Not Prevent Heart Attacks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/evista-does-not-prevent-heart-attacks-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Association for Eradication of Heart Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiovascular-disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Info]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2006/04/06/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Via e-mail yesterday, I learned about the Association for Eradication of Heart Attack.  In June, their main project &#8211; S.H.A.P.E., Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education &#8211; will publish an executive summary of the SHAPE task force report in the American Journal of Cardiology.
Primarily, they are proposing to identify close to 65 million asymptomatic individuals vulnerable to first heart attacks by detecting subclinical atherosclerosis and documenting risk factors.  

Screen all men aged 45 and older, women aged 55 and older
Test for atherosclerosis by determining coronary calcium score via CT scan or carotid artery intima-media thickness via ultraound [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack-50/">Association for Eradication of Heart Attack</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2006/04/The%20Latest%20VP%20Pyramid%20(2).jpg"></center></p>
<p>Via e-mail yesterday, I learned about the <a href="http://aeha.org/">Association for Eradication of Heart Attack</a>.  In June, their main project &#8211; <a href="http://aeha.org/GET%20IN%20SHAPE%20-%20Association%20for%20Eradication%20of%20Heart%20Attacks.htm">S.H.A.P.E.</a>, Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education &#8211; will publish an executive summary of the SHAPE task force report in the American Journal of Cardiology.</p>
<p>Primarily, they are proposing to identify close to 65 million asymptomatic individuals vulnerable to first heart attacks by detecting subclinical atherosclerosis and documenting risk factors.  </p>
<ul>
<li>Screen all men aged 45 and older, women aged 55 and older</li>
<li>Test for atherosclerosis by determining coronary calcium score via CT scan or carotid artery intima-media thickness via ultraound (both non-invasive)</li>
</ul>
<p>Early detection could prevent more than 90,000 CVD deaths each year and reduce the rate of heart attacks by as much as 25 percent. The task force believes early screening will save approximately $21.5 billion annually.</p>
<p>These numbers, of course, are optimistic and assume that everyone who is eligible will avail themselves of screening.  As we all know, people are stubborn and often prefer not to know any specifics about their health.  If you are willing to get a regular check-up then all the better.  Regardless, eat right, exercise, and live a healthy lifestyle.  </p>
<p>*E-mail tip from <a href="http://www.keeneypr.com/">Daniel Keeney, APR</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack-50/">Association for Eradication of Heart Attack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/association-for-eradication-of-heart-attack-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>