<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; H.R. 20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/hr-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Postpartum Depression Legislation: Beneficial Or Conspiratorial?</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial-234/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial-234/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Sparks, Mental Health Notes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dbsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression and bipolar support alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R. 20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Blocker-Stokes Postpartum Depression Research aMelanie-blocker-stokes-postpartum-depression-research-a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.1375]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalhealthnotes.com/2008/04/09/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Back in January, I notified you all of an advocacy alert regarding the Melanie Blocker-Stokes Postpartum Depression Research and Care Act (S.1375) from the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA).
Yesterday I received another advocacy alert from the DBSA. This one was also related to postpartum depression and S.1375 (and the House&#8217;s version, H.R. 20), only this one was titled an &#8220;URGENT REQUEST.&#8221;
Why?
Well, according to the alert, it seems as if &#8220;some mistakenly believe [the legislation] is a conspiracy to push new mothers to take medication.&#8221;
Hmm&#8230;I&#8217;ve read the House version of the bill (which explains postpartum depression, highlights treatment options &#8211; [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial-234/">Postpartum Depression Legislation: Beneficial Or Conspiratorial?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/234/2008/01/presidential_seal.jpg" style="border: 1px solid ; margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px; padding: 2px; float: right" /></p>
<p>Back in January, I notified you all of an <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/2008/01/28/postpartum-depression-the-melanie-stokes-mother%e2%80%99s-act/">advocacy alert</a> regarding the Melanie Blocker-Stokes Postpartum Depression Research and Care Act (S.1375) from the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA).</p>
<p>Yesterday I received <a href="http://capwiz.com/ndmda/issues/alert/?alertid=11246546">another advocacy alert</a> from the DBSA. This one was also related to postpartum depression and S.1375 (and the House&#8217;s version, H.R. 20), only this one was titled an &#8220;<strong>URGENT REQUEST</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Well, according to the alert, it seems as if &#8220;some mistakenly believe [the legislation] is a conspiracy to push new mothers to take medication.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230;I&#8217;ve read <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-20">the House version of the bill</a> (which explains postpartum depression, highlights treatment options &#8211; &#8220;including social support, therapy, medication, and when necessary hospitalization&#8221; &#8211; and explains the need for funding and more research), and I&#8217;ve read <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-1375">the Senate version of the bill</a> (which does basically the same things), and not once did I feel as if a conspiracy to pump medicine into mothers&#8217; mouthes was underway.</p>
<p><a href="http://capwiz.com/ndmda/issues/alert/?alertid=11246546">In the advocacy alert</a>, the DBSA provides its own summary of what the legislation does. According to the DBSA, the legislation aims to:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Encourage the Department of Health and Human Services to expand the research into the causes of postpartum conditions and find treatments.</li>
<li>Establish a national public awareness campaign to increase awareness and knowledge of PPD and psychosis.</li>
<li>Make grants available for programs that develop and offer essential services to women with PPD.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>This seems about right to me.</p>
<p>So why are there people who feel as if this legislation is a conspiracy to push medicine? Just because medication is mentioned? Isn&#8217;t medication mention in many mental health-related bills? Because medication is a very real part of some patients&#8217; treatment plans, doesn&#8217;t it make sense that it would be listed as a treatment option?</p>
<p>I honestly don&#8217;t understand why some people think this legislation is a conspiracy.</p>
<p>In any event, at the bottom of <a href="http://capwiz.com/ndmda/issues/alert/?alertid=11246546">the advocacy alert</a> the DBSA provides an online form for those who want to send letters of support to President Bush, Vice President Cheney, the current presidential runners, and their representatives.</p>
<p>I just sent mine.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/234/2007/09/sigmhn.jpg" alt="Alicia" /></p>
<p><a href="http://morguefile.com/archive/?display=171908&amp;">Image source and credit</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial-234/">Postpartum Depression Legislation: Beneficial Or Conspiratorial?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/postpartum-depression-legislation-beneficial-or-conspiratorial-234/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>