<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; merck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/merck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Drug Company Guarantees</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/drug-company-guarantees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/drug-company-guarantees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cherie Burbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug company guarantees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine that doesn't work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blisstree.com/?p=82212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever taken a pill or other type of medication that just, for whatever reason, has not worked?  Yeah, me too.  Luckily, most of the time my doctor is able to give me a sample so we can see if it works or not.  Sometimes, though, I&#8217;ve paid for a whole bottle of pills, taken one, and had it not work.  Then I&#8217;ve ended up throwing the lot of them out and wasting a bunch of money besides.

Now, it appears that some drug makers are trying to &#8220;adjust what they charge for their drugs, based [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/drug-company-guarantees/">Drug Company Guarantees</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever taken a pill or other type of medication that just, for whatever reason, has not worked?  Yeah, me too.  Luckily, most of the time my doctor is able to give me a sample so we can see if it works or not.  Sometimes, though, I&#8217;ve paid for a whole bottle of pills, taken one, and had it not work.  Then I&#8217;ve ended up throwing the lot of them out and wasting a bunch of money besides.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-82210" src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/2009/04/1111309_pills.jpg" alt="1111309_pills" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>Now, it appears that some drug makers are trying to &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/business/23cigna.html">adjust what they charge for their drugs, based on how well the medicines improve patients’ health</a>.&#8221;  Kind of like a &#8220;guaranteed or your money back&#8221; type of thing.  The first of this type of program is expected to be with Merck.  Merck will base the cost of Januvia and Janumet (both for diabetes) based on how well the patients respond to this drug and are able to control their blood sugar.</p>
<p>I think this could be a good thing.  After all, if the product doesn&#8217;t deliver, we should have the right to take it back like we do any other type of item we might purchase.  What do you think?</p>
<p><em>Image: <a href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1111309">sxc.hu</a>.</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/drug-company-guarantees/">Drug Company Guarantees</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/drug-company-guarantees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merck Set To Pay $4.85 Billion To Settle On Vioxx Lawsuits</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arthritis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class_action_suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversial_drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart-attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart_failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx_lawsuits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2007/11/11/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The maker of Vioxx has agreed to pay $4.85bn to settle legal claims that the controversial drug caused many users to suffer strokes and heart failure.
Holy Potatoes is what I have to say. But I guess it could have been far worse when you really stop and think about it. In order to qualify for compensation you must prove that you suffered serious illness at the most 2 weeks after you purchased the drug.
The above amount of money will be able to settle over 90% of Vioxx lawsuits with the exception of class action suits. Like I said, it could [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits-50/">Merck Set To Pay $4.85 Billion To Settle On Vioxx Lawsuits</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong><em><font size="2">The maker of Vioxx has agreed to pay $4.85bn to settle legal claims that the controversial drug caused many users to suffer strokes and heart failure.</font></em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2007/11/mercvioxxxx.jpg" title="mercvioxxxx.jpg" alt="mercvioxxxx.jpg" align="right" />Holy Potatoes is what I have to say. But I guess it could have been far worse when you really stop and think about it. In order to qualify for compensation you must prove that you suffered serious illness at the most 2 weeks after you purchased the drug.</p>
<p>The above amount of money will be able to settle over 90% of Vioxx lawsuits with the exception of class action suits. Like I said, it could have been worse for Merck.<br />
via <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7087348.stm">Science Daily</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits-50/">Merck Set To Pay $4.85 Billion To Settle On Vioxx Lawsuits</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/merck-set-to-pay-485-billion-to-settle-on-vioxx-lawsuits-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avandia Linked To An Increased Risk Of Heart Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arthritis_medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetic_drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug_approval_process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug_avandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[england_journal_of_medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline_plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heart Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal_of_medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market_eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_england_journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_england_journal_of_medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type_2_diabetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2007/05/21/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, I just wrote about this on Diabetes Notes, but since everyone and their mother sent me the link, I will share it on A Hearty Life as well.  The popular type 2 diabetic drug Avandia has now been linked to an increased risk of heart disease and possibly death.
 More than 6 million people worldwide have taken the drug sold by London-based GlaxoSmithKline PLC since it came on the market eight years ago. Pooled results of dozens of studies revealed a 43 percent higher risk of heart attack, according to the review published by the New England Journal [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease-50/">Avandia Linked To An Increased Risk Of Heart Disease</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2007/05/avandia.thumbnail.jpg" title="avandia.jpg" alt="avandia.jpg" align="right" />Funny, I just wrote about this on <a href="http://www.diabetesnotes.com">Diabetes Notes</a>, but since everyone and their mother sent me the link, I will share it on A Hearty Life as well.  The popular type 2 diabetic drug Avandia has now been linked to an increased risk of heart disease and possibly death.</p>
<blockquote><p> <em><strong>More than 6 million people worldwide have taken the drug sold by London-based GlaxoSmithKline PLC since it came on the market eight years ago. Pooled results of dozens of studies revealed a 43 percent higher risk of heart attack, according to the review published by the New England Journal of Medicine.</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>The numbers are fairly impressive and warrant concern and questions.  Why was the medication approved in the first place?  Why did it take this long for research to be done on Avandia if there was speculation?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>When the drug was approved, &#8220;evidence was at best mixed&#8221; on its benefit, wrote the two doctors. Both have been frequent critics of the FDA&#8217;s failure to spot dangers in the drug approval process and its conduct in the case involving Vioxx. The popular arthritis medicine sold by Merck &amp; Co. was taken off the market in 2004 when heart problems came to light after it had been taken by millions of people </em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>We all remember the happenings that followed with the discovery of the increased cardiac risks of Vioxx.  Will Avandia follow suit?</p>
<p>Bottom line in my opinion, if you are on Avandia and have heart disease, you need to ask questions.  You and only you can protect yourself.   As I always say, be your own advocate!</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/conditions/05/21/avandia.heart.ap/index.html">CNN</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease-50/">Avandia Linked To An Increased Risk Of Heart Disease</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/avandia-linked-to-an-increased-risk-of-heart-disease-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>