<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; mouth_to_mouth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/mouth_to_mouth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CPR- no mouth needed!</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cpr-no-mouth-needed-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cpr-no-mouth-needed-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ample_evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bystander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_resuscitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chest_compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chest_compressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drowning_victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence_that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard_women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learned_my_lesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouth_to_mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurological_outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People With Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rescue_attempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stopped_breathing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2008/10/24/cpr-no-mouth-needed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Chest compression alone nearly doubled the chances of a good neurological outcome in patients at greatest risk (those that stopped breathing, which accounted for 90 percent of those in the study).
* The good outcomes were most likely if the rescue attempt began within four minutes of the collapse.
* Mouth-to-mouth ventilation provided no real benefit.
* Those given compressions alone survived as often as those given traditional CPR (chest compressions plus rescue breaths).
What do you think about this?  This follows new research that shows mouth to mouth is not necessary for survival of cardiac arrest.  This was studied due to the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cpr-no-mouth-needed-50/">CPR- no mouth needed!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>* Chest compression alone nearly doubled the chances of a good neurological outcome in patients at greatest risk (those that stopped <a href="http://www.blisstree.com/2007/06/12/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth/" id="KonaLink0" target="undefined" class="kLink" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static"><font style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif; font-size: 13px; position: static"><span class="kLink" style="font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif; font-size: 13px; position: static">breathing</span></font></a>, which accounted for 90 percent of those in the study).<br />
* The good outcomes were most likely if the rescue attempt began within four minutes of the collapse.<br />
* Mouth-to-mouth ventilation provided no real benefit.<br />
* Those given compressions alone survived as often as those given traditional CPR (chest compressions plus rescue breaths).</em></strong></p>
<p>What do you think about this?  This follows new research that shows mouth to mouth is not necessary for survival of cardiac arrest.  This was studied due to the fact that when an average bystander witnesses someone go down from cardiac arrest, they are not super psyched about swapping spit with the unknown.</p>
<p><strong><em>This was reported in the Harvard Women’s Heath Watch, which stressed the background and importance of the development: This new approach isn’t widely known or usually taught to the public because, up to now, there hasn’t been enough evidence to achieve broad endorsement. </em></strong></p>
<p>Researchers are now insisting that there is ample evidence that shows the “new” approach to be superior from a neurological point of view and will help provide more volunteers that will assist in cardiac resuscitation now that mouth to mouth is eliminated.</p>
<p>They do warn not to forget your traditional CPR for drowning victims and such.  I personally carry a shield with me in my purse, so I can pop it over someones mouth if mouth to mouth is ever needed.  I learned my lesson the hard way.  After 10 minutes of administering CPR, the helpless bystander that I was resuscitating vomited in my mouth.  Yeah, it was so gross, but he lived!</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=18461650&amp;BRD=2737&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=576361&amp;rfi=6">The Bulletin Philadelphia </a></p>
<p><span class="UTWPrimaryTags"><br />
<a href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/stopped_breathing/" rel="tag"></a></span></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cpr-no-mouth-needed-50/">CPR- no mouth needed!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/cpr-no-mouth-needed-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Chest Compressions Enough To Save Lives</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chest_compressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay_time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital_walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouth_to_mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respiratory_distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stranger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2008/01/07/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CPR&#8230;very pertinent, important information for each and every person out there! Have you ever actually witnessed someone out and about fall into cardiac arrest? The majority of you are shaking your heads no, but for all that have been a part of this&#8230; it is plain out scary.
I live, I mean live for a good code, cardiac arrest or respiratory distress call. I am after all a cardiac critical nurse through and through, but not outside of those hospital walls. It is just as scary for me as anyone else&#8230; CPR-especially on a stranger.
Another study has concluded that chest compressions [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives-50/">Just Chest Compressions Enough To Save Lives</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2008/01/cprchestcompressiononly.jpg" title="cprchestcompressiononly.jpg" alt="cprchestcompressiononly.jpg" align="right" />CPR&#8230;very pertinent, important information for each and every person out there! Have you ever actually witnessed someone out and about fall into cardiac arrest? The majority of you are shaking your heads no, but for all that have been a part of this&#8230; it is plain out scary.</p>
<p>I live, I mean live for a good code, cardiac arrest or respiratory distress call. I am after all a cardiac critical nurse through and through, but not outside of those hospital walls. It is just as scary for me as anyone else&#8230; CPR-especially on a stranger.</p>
<p>Another study has concluded that chest compressions alone are more beneficial in this situation then mouth to mouth combined with compressions. That is great info. How many of you would want to put your lips around a strangers lips and start blowing away? Uh huh, me neither!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071226230920.htm">This is exactly one of the speculations that researchers </a>supposed when examining the results. There is an increased time delay when thinking about whether or not to carry out CPR when the mouth was involved versus just chest compressions. It makes perfect sense to me. I hope that you share this info with everyone you know, it could save someones life!!</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives-50/">Just Chest Compressions Enough To Save Lives</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/just-chest-compressions-enough-to-save-lives-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Suggestion For CPR Resuscitation, No Mouth-To-Mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpr_research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lungs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouth_to_mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research_group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resuscitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarver_heart_center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2007/08/07/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study once again on CPR&#8230;  UA&#8217;s Sarver Heart Center, and a CPR research group have pioneered a new type of CPR known as cardio-cerebral resuscitation.  This this type of CPR suggests 100 forceful compressions with no mouth-to-mouth.
 &#8220;Compressions, for them to be effective, have to be fast and forceful. People tend to do them too slowly,&#8221; Clark said. &#8220;Most lay people can&#8217;t do 100 compressions in a minute so we suggest that people do team compressions.
The thoughts behind this is that we do not need to get additional oxygen to the lungs but we certainly need [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth-50/">A New Suggestion For CPR Resuscitation, No Mouth-To-Mouth</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2007/08/cpr.jpg" title="cpr.jpg" alt="cpr.jpg" align="right" />A new study once again on CPR&#8230;  UA&#8217;s Sarver Heart Center, and a CPR research group have pioneered a new type of CPR known as <strong>cardio-cerebral resuscitation.  </strong>This this type of CPR suggests 100 forceful compressions with no mouth-to-mouth.</p>
<blockquote><p> <em><strong>&#8220;Compressions, for them to be effective, have to be fast and forceful. People tend to do them too slowly,&#8221; Clark said. &#8220;Most lay people can&#8217;t do 100 compressions in a minute so we suggest that people do team compressions.</strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>The thoughts behind this is that we do not need to get additional oxygen to the lungs but we certainly need to provide oxygen to the heart and brain.   So based on this research the layperson&#8217;s CPR is very simple and easy, call 911 and start compressions.  Have you heard anything about this?  What is your opinion?</p>
<p>via <a href="http://media.wildcat.arizona.edu/media/storage/paper997/news/2007/08/06/News/Sarver.Center.Director.Touts.New.Resuscitation.Method-2929519.shtml">The Wildcat Online</a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth-50/">A New Suggestion For CPR Resuscitation, No Mouth-To-Mouth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/a-new-suggestion-for-cpr-resuscitation-no-mouth-to-mouth-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Approach to CPR Eliminates The Need For Mouth to Mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth-50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kendra James, RN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ample_evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bystander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardiac_resuscitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chest_compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chest_compressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drowning_victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence_that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard_women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearty Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learned_my_lesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouth_to_mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurological_outcome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rescue_attempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stopped_breathing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aheartylife.com/2007/06/12/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Chest compression alone nearly doubled the chances of a good neurological outcome in patients at greatest risk (those that stopped breathing, which accounted for 90 percent of those in the study).
* The good outcomes were most likely if the rescue attempt began within four minutes of the collapse.
* Mouth-to-mouth ventilation provided no real benefit.
* Those given compressions alone survived as often as those given traditional CPR (chest compressions plus rescue breaths).
What do you think about this?  This follows new research that shows mouth to mouth is not necessary for survival of cardiac arrest.  This was studied due to the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth-50/">New Approach to CPR Eliminates The Need For Mouth to Mouth</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>* Chest compression alone nearly doubled the chances of a good neurological outcome in patients at greatest risk (those that stopped breathing, which accounted for 90 percent of those in the study).<br />
* The good outcomes were most likely if the rescue attempt began within four minutes of the collapse.<br />
* Mouth-to-mouth ventilation provided no real benefit.<br />
* Those given compressions alone survived as often as those given traditional CPR (chest compressions plus rescue breaths).</em></strong></p>
<p>What do you think about this?  This follows new research that shows mouth to mouth is not necessary for survival of cardiac arrest.  This was studied due to the fact that when an average bystander witnesses someone go down from cardiac arrest, they are not super psyched about swapping spit with the unknown.</p>
<p><strong><em>This was reported in the Harvard Women&#8217;s Heath Watch, which stressed the background and importance of the development: This new approach isn&#8217;t widely known or usually taught to the public because, up to now, there hasn&#8217;t been enough evidence to achieve broad endorsement. </em></strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.blisstree.com/files/50/2007/06/cpr.jpg" title="cpr.jpg" alt="cpr.jpg" align="right" />Researchers are now insisting that there is ample evidence that shows the &#8220;new&#8221; approach to be superior from a neurological point of view and will help provide more volunteers that will assist in cardiac resuscitation now that mouth to mouth is eliminated.</p>
<p>They do warn not to forget your traditional CPR for drowning victims and such.  I personally carry a shield with me in my purse, so I can pop it over someones mouth if mouth to mouth is ever needed.  I learned my lesson the hard way.  After 10 minutes of administering CPR, the helpless bystander that I was resuscitating vomited in my mouth.  Yeah, it was so gross, but he lived!</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=18461650&amp;BRD=2737&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=576361&amp;rfi=6">The Bulletin Philadelphia </a></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth-50/">New Approach to CPR Eliminates The Need For Mouth to Mouth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/new-approach-to-cpr-eliminates-the-need-for-mouth-to-mouth-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>