<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; Photoshopping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/photoshopping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Buttocks in magazines may be larger than they appear</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/buttocks-in-magazines-may-be-larger-than-they-appear-325/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/buttocks-in-magazines-may-be-larger-than-they-appear-325/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angelique</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ephiphanies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starlets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breakingthemirror.com/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had an epiphany which isn&#8217;t really an epiphany at all, especially given that I knew it all along.  Yet somehow, it&#8217;s finally sunk into my crazed little mind.
Photos on and within the covers of magazines have been highly doctored.
(I know, I know.  You&#8217;re going to say, &#8220;Duh.  Tell me something new, Angelique.&#8221;  I get it.)
Yes, I understood this was the case for many years, but over the past few days, I&#8217;ve found myself standing in line at the grocery store, looking at popular publications and literally asking myself (silently, so as not to attract too much attention, of course), &#8220;I [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/buttocks-in-magazines-may-be-larger-than-they-appear-325/">Buttocks in magazines may be larger than they appear</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had an epiphany which isn&#8217;t really an epiphany at all, especially given that I knew it all along.  Yet somehow, it&#8217;s finally sunk into my crazed little mind.</p>
<p>Photos on and within the covers of magazines have been highly doctored.</p>
<p>(I know, I know.  You&#8217;re going to say, &#8220;Duh.  Tell me something new, Angelique.&#8221;  I get it.)</p>
<p>Yes, I understood this was the case for many years, but over the past few days, I&#8217;ve found myself standing in line at the grocery store, looking at popular publications and literally asking myself (silently, so as not to attract too much attention, of course), &#8220;I wonder what these stars and starlets really look like?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so obvious now that my mind has accepted the fact that Photoshopping is widespread&#8230; that Eva Longoria&#8217;s hips may be &#8220;shaved&#8221; just a tad&#8230; that Jennifer Aniston&#8217;s physique may have been tailored to fit the mood of the mag.</p>
<p>Amazing.  I finally &#8220;get it&#8221; 100%.  This could be the start of something incredible&#8230; the acceptance of what a REAL body honestly looks like. </p>
<p>*gulp* </p>
<p><em>So why am I scared?</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/buttocks-in-magazines-may-be-larger-than-they-appear-325/">Buttocks in magazines may be larger than they appear</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/buttocks-in-magazines-may-be-larger-than-they-appear-325/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>