<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blisstree &#187; World Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blisstree.com/tag/world-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blisstree.com</link>
	<description>Family, Health, Home and Lifestyles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Do You Mean No Crosstalk?</title>
		<link>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diseases & Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AA Crosstalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Did You Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Service Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twelve-Traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adozensteps.com/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to my friend Alex;
What Does &#8216;Crosstalk&#8217; Have to Do with Our Primary Purpose?
[Reprinted From Box 459 - published bi-monthly by General Services Office of Alcoholics Anonymous]
Just what is this thing called &#8220;crosstalk&#8221;? Why are concerned A.A.s writing to the General Service Office for clarification about it? And, bottom line, what does it have to do with our primary purpose: &#8220;to stay sober and help other alcoholics to achieve sobriety&#8221;?
The word has been with us at least since 1887. Webster&#8217;s 10th Edition defines crosstalk as &#8220;unwanted signals in a communication channel caused by transference of energy from another circuit&#8221;- as [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk-16/">What Do You Mean No Crosstalk?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to my friend Alex;</p>
<p align="center"><strong>What Does &#8216;Crosstalk&#8217; Have to Do with Our Primary Purpose?</strong></p>
<p>[Reprinted From Box 459 - published bi-monthly by General Services Office of <a href="http://www.aa.org/" target="_blank">Alcoholics Anonymous</a>]</p>
<p>Just what is this thing called &#8220;crosstalk&#8221;? Why are concerned A.A.s writing to the General Service Office for clarification about it? And, bottom line, what does it have to do with our primary purpose: <strong>&#8220;to stay sober and help other alcoholics to achieve sobriety&#8221;</strong>?</p>
<p>The word has been with us at least since 1887. Webster&#8217;s 10th Edition defines crosstalk as &#8220;unwanted signals in a communication channel caused by transference of energy from another circuit&#8221;- as when, for instance, two members sitting side by side at an A.A. meeting carry on a private, yet not so quiet, conversation or when one member interrupts another rudely or inappropriately. But this is not the kind of crosstalk that members are asking about; specifically, it is traceable to a list of guidelines for behavior at AA meetings &#8212; <strong>erroneously attributed to &#8220;World Service&#8221;</strong> that appears in 1992 in a central office newsletter and has since been reprinted and circulated more widely.</p>
<p><span id="more-1004"></span></p>
<p>The guidelines state, in part, that &#8220;Any comments, negative or positive, about another&#8217;s share, experience, life, program or remarks are crosstalk&#8211;that is interference.&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;The only appropriate comment about anyone else&#8217;s share&#8211;a speaker&#8217;s or another member&#8217;s &#8212; is &#8216;Thank you for your share.&#8217;&#8221; &#8220;A member may talk about his or her own experience as it relates directly or indirectly to another&#8217;s share, but should not refer to that person&#8217;s share. Even comments such as &#8216;When you talk about&#8230; it reminded me of my own experience&#8230;&#8217; are possibly inappropriate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The so-called guidelines <strong>did not emanate from the General Service Office</strong>. What random investigation reveals is that they may have filtered into some A.A. groups through members who also attend other Twelve Step recovery groups. For example:</p>
<p>(1) In its literature, one fellowship includes a boxed item head, &#8220;Suggested Announcement Regarding Crosstalk &amp; Feedback (adopted (1/13/87).&#8221; It reads: &#8220;In sharing during meetings, we proceed in an orderly, respectful manner. The chairperson (or speaker) will call on people to share. We do not interrupt one another or engage in discussion &#8211; this is called &#8216;crosstalk.&#8217; While we encourage expressions of identification with a speaker and appreciation for speakers, we also do not judge or comment on what people say or tell them what to do &#8211; this is called &#8216;feedback.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>(2) Another anonymous organization, in its &#8220;Suggested Meeting Format,&#8221; asks attendees &#8220;to please not interrupt someone else&#8217;s sharing, not to make comments about other people&#8217;s statements&#8230; and to talk only about yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although many self-help groups emulate A.A.&#8217;s Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions, their practices often differ from ours in other respects. As they may have discovered in adapting the A.A. program to their own needs, what&#8217;s sauce for the goose may be poison for the gander. Says Anne T., of Rome, New York, who belongs to AA. and also attends meetings of a different fellowship: &#8220;From the very beginning, one drunk talking to another has made the A.A. program go round. But in meetings (of the other fellowship), I feel, it makes sense to refrain from crosstalk. People are trying to free themselves from extraordinary shame. When someone shares in response to something I&#8217;ve said, that&#8217;s okay, but only so long as there&#8217;s not even a hint of censure, belittlement, scolding or preaching, all under the guise of sharing. Knowing there&#8217;s no risk of judgment makes me feel safe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looking at the subject from an AA&#8217;s point of view, a G.S.O. staff member says, &#8220;Comparing notes, many of us realized that <em><strong>nonjudgmental suggestions we had received in meetings in response to something we had shared, was very beneficial to our recovery.</strong></em> It is how we learn, and that&#8217;s what &#8217;sharing experience, strength and hope&#8217; is all about. Also, there is a thin line between guidelines and rules; and experience suggests that in A.A.&#8217;s &#8216;benign anarchy,&#8217; rules, rigidity and attempts to control don&#8217;t work very well.&#8221; Whether an individual A.A. group chooses to include the crosstalk &#8216;guidelines&#8217; in its meeting format is entirely up to its group conscience to determine, of course. <strong>But please do not say that such guidelines came from the General Service Office.</strong>&#8220;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.blisstree.com">Blisstree</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.blisstree.com/articles/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk-16/">What Do You Mean No Crosstalk?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blisstree.com/articles/what-do-you-mean-no-crosstalk-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>